These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22809082)

  • 1. Normal people in clinical practice: a general factor of personality in biproportional scaling and its practical relevance.
    Mosterman RM
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 22809082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.
    Kurtz JE; Puher MA; Cross NA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 22489598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-informant agreement on personality ratings and self-awareness after head injury.
    Kurtz JE; Putnam SH
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 16895858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-other disagreement in personality assessment: significance and prognostic value.
    Mosterman RM; Hendriks AA
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 21110408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Convergence of Self-Reports and Informant Reports on the Personality Assessment Screener.
    Kelley SE; Edens JF; Morey LC
    Assessment; 2017 Dec; 24(8):999-1007. PubMed ID: 26951323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary study of perceived stress in adults with intellectual disabilities according to self-report and informant ratings.
    Lunsky Y; Bramston P
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2006 Mar; 31(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 16766319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
    Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informant personality descriptions of postintimate stalkers using the five factor profile.
    Kamphuis JH; Emmelkamp PM; de Vries V
    J Pers Assess; 2004 Apr; 82(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 15041523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correspondence between five-factor and RIASEC models of personality.
    Schinka JA; Dye DA; Curtiss G
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Apr; 68(2):355-68. PubMed ID: 9107013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators.
    Grucza RA; Goldberg LR
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Oct; 89(2):167-87. PubMed ID: 17764394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correspondence of psychiatric patient and informant ratings of personality traits, temperament, and interpersonal problems.
    Ready RE; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Mar; 14(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 11911048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The making of meaning: comments on Hofstee and Ten Berge.
    McGrath RE
    J Pers Assess; 2004 Oct; 83(2):128-30; discussion 136-40. PubMed ID: 15456647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factor analysis of the Dutch-language version of the MCMI-III.
    Rossi G; van der Ark LA; Sloore H
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Apr; 88(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 17437380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: evidence of the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Quirk SW; Christiansen ND; Wagner SH; McNulty JL
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):311-25. PubMed ID: 14593831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing young adolescents' personality with the five-factor personality inventory.
    Jolijn Hendriks AA; Kuyper H; Johan Offringa G; Van der Werf MP
    Assessment; 2008 Sep; 15(3):304-16. PubMed ID: 18310594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders: the utility of self-reports and observer ratings.
    Miller JD; Pilkonis PA; Morse JQ
    Assessment; 2004 Jun; 11(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 15171460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The structure of axis II disorders in adolescents: a cluster- and factor-analytic investigation of DSM-IV categories and criteria.
    Durrett C; Westen D
    J Pers Disord; 2005 Aug; 19(4):440-61. PubMed ID: 16178684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric Comparison of Self- and Informant-Reports of Personality.
    Olino TM; Klein DN
    Assessment; 2015 Dec; 22(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 25612626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations.
    Achenbach TM; Krukowski RA; Dumenci L; Ivanova MY
    Psychol Bull; 2005 May; 131(3):361-82. PubMed ID: 15869333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The NEO-FFI is a reliable measure of premorbid personality in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.
    Archer N; Brown RG; Boothby H; Foy C; Nicholas H; Lovestone S
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2006 May; 21(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 16676294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.