These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22809219)

  • 1. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: a clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument.
    Yan J; Min J; Zhou B
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 22809219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of clinical practice guidelines in dermatological oncology.
    de Haas ER; de Vijlder HC; van Reesema WS; van Everdingen JJ; Neumann HA
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Oct; 21(9):1193-8. PubMed ID: 17894704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An independent AGREE evaluation of the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.
    Cates JR; Young DN; Bowerman DS; Porter RC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 16413451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
    Huang M; Zhou X
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 26507460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic evaluation of the quality of clinical practice guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive techniques.
    Gutarra-Vilchez RB; Barajas-Nava L; Aleman A; Solà I; Gich I; Bonfill X; Alonso-Coello P
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 24472024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
    Zeng M; Yi Q; Zeng L; Chen Z; Mi X; Song H; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang Q; Zhao R; Miao L; Zhang L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():47-58. PubMed ID: 31678686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993 - 2010.
    Chen YL; Yao L; Xiao XJ; Wang Q; Wang ZH; Liang FX; Liang H; Wang X; Shen XP; Xie CC; Yang KH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Oct; 125(20):3660-4. PubMed ID: 23075720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical appraisal of the North American Spine Society guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
    Yaman ME; Gudeloglu A; Senturk S; Yaman ND; Tolunay T; Ozturk Y; Arslan AK
    Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 25614152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating clinical practice guidelines developed for the management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancers and assessing the reliability and validity of the AGREE instrument.
    Irani S; Rashidian A; Yousefi-Nooraie R; Soltani A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Aug; 17(4):729-36. PubMed ID: 21223456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of evidence-based pediatric guidelines.
    Boluyt N; Lincke CR; Offringa M
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):1378-91. PubMed ID: 15867050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality evaluation of guidelines on genetic screening, surveillance and management of hereditary colorectal cancer.
    Simone B; De Feo E; Nicolotti N; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    Eur J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 22(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 22140249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical appraisal and comparison of the quality and recommendations of glaucoma clinical practice guidelines.
    Ou Y; Goldberg I; Migdal C; Lee PP
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1017-23. PubMed ID: 21507487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rigour of development does not AGREE with recommendations in practice guidelines on the use of ice for acute ankle sprains.
    Van de Velde S; Heselmans A; Donceel P; Vandekerckhove P; Ramaekers D; Aertgeerts B
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Sep; 20(9):747-55. PubMed ID: 21339311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the current guidelines for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
    Gavriilidis P; Roberts KJ; Askari A; Sutcliffe RP; Huo TL; Liu PH; Hidalgo E; Compagnon P; Lim C; Azoulay D
    J Hepatol; 2017 Nov; 67(5):991-998. PubMed ID: 28690176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical appraisal of 2007 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management: an independent review utilizing AGREE, AMA, IOM, and other criteria.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Trescot AM; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(3):291-310. PubMed ID: 18523501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical practice guidelines in primary health care: a critical appraisal].
    Pantoja T; Strain H; Valenzuela L
    Rev Med Chil; 2007 Oct; 135(10):1282-90. PubMed ID: 18180835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational Asthma guidelines: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.
    Lytras T; Bonovas S; Chronis C; Konstantinidis AK; Kopsachilis F; Papamichail DP; Dounias G
    Occup Environ Med; 2014 Feb; 71(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 24213564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines.
    Hurdowar A; Graham ID; Bayley M; Harrison M; Wood-Dauphinee S; Bhogal S
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 17683311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment (biotherapy excluded) of psoriatic arthritis: an appraisal of methodological quality of international guidelines.
    Sevrain M; Villani AP; Rouzaud M; Barnetche T; Paul C; Richard MA; Beylot-Barry M; Jullien D; Aractingi S; Aubin F; Joly P; Le Maitre M; Cantagrel A; Ortonne JP; Misery L
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2014 Aug; 28 Suppl 5():33-9. PubMed ID: 24985561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review and evaluation of the Dutch guidelines for osteoporosis.
    Geusens PP; Lems WF; Verhaar HJ; Leusink G; Goemaere S; Zmierczack H; Compston J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Oct; 12(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16987116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.