These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22809426)

  • 21. Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.
    Phalan B; Onial M; Balmford A; Green RE
    Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6047):1289-91. PubMed ID: 21885781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of land-sharing and land-sparing strategies for plant richness conservation in agricultural landscapes.
    Egan JF; Mortensen DA
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Mar; 22(2):459-71. PubMed ID: 22611847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conservation biogeography of red oaks (Quercus, section Lobatae) in Mexico and Central America.
    Torres-Miranda A; Luna-Vega I; Oyama K
    Am J Bot; 2011 Feb; 98(2):290-305. PubMed ID: 21613118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Costs of expanding the network of protected areas as a response to climate change in the Cape Floristic Region.
    Wise RM; Reyers B; Guo C; Midgley GF; De Lange W
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Jun; 26(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 22497474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings.
    McDonald RI; Yuan-Farrell C; Fievet C; Moeller M; Kareiva P; Foster D; Gragson T; Kinzig A; Kuby L; Redman C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1526-36. PubMed ID: 18173476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contribution of urban expansion and a changing climate to decline of a butterfly fauna.
    Casner KL; Forister ML; O'Brien JM; Thorne J; Waetjen D; Shapiro AM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):773-82. PubMed ID: 24527888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterizing urbanization, and agricultural and conservation land-use change in Riverside County, California, USA.
    Chen X; Li BL; Allen MF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 May; 1195 Suppl 1():E164-76. PubMed ID: 20586769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem.
    Winfree R; Griswold T; Kremen C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 17298527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Climatic and socioeconomic effects on land cover changes across Europe: Does protected area designation matter?
    Hellwig N; Walz A; Markovic D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219374. PubMed ID: 31314769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The capacity of Australia's protected-area system to represent threatened species.
    Watson JE; Evans MC; Carwardine J; Fuller RA; Joseph LN; Segan DB; Taylor MF; Fensham RJ; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 20961332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Global mammal conservation: what must we manage?
    Ceballos G; Ehrlich PR; Soberón J; Salazar I; Fay JP
    Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5734):603-7. PubMed ID: 16040704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trade-offs between species conservation and the size of marine protected areas.
    Chittaro PM; Kaplan IC; Keller A; Levin PS
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 19758392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Land-cover change and avian diversity in the conterminous United States.
    Rittenhouse CD; Pidgeon AM; Albright TP; Culbert PD; Clayton MK; Flather CH; Masek JG; Radeloff VC
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):821-9. PubMed ID: 22731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effectiveness of surrogate taxa for the representation of biodiversity.
    Lewandowski AS; Noss RF; Parsons DR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 20455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Urbanization and the more-individuals hypothesis.
    Chiari C; Dinetti M; Licciardello C; Licitra G; Pautasso M
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Mar; 79(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 19863631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: challenges and opportunities of coffee agroforests in the Western Ghats, India.
    Garcia CA; Bhagwat SA; Ghazoul J; Nath CD; Nanaya KM; Kushalappa CG; Raghuramulu Y; Nasi R; Vaast P
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 20028413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biodiversity and agro-ecology in field margins.
    De Cauwer B; Reheul D; Nijs I; Milbau A
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(1):17-49. PubMed ID: 16363358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of private-land use, livestock management, and human tolerance on diversity, distribution, and abundance of large african mammals.
    Kinnaird MF; O'brien TG
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):1026-39. PubMed ID: 23082891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Land development in and around protected areas at the wilderness frontier.
    Leroux SJ; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 23088594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.