547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22809633)
1. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.
Vineeth K; Lalitha RM; Prasad K; Ranganath K; Shwetha V; Singh J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 22809633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
Sehgal S; Ramanujam L; Prasad K; Krishnappa R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of mandibular interforaminal fractures using 3 dimensional locking and standard titanium miniplates - a comparative preliminary report of 10 cases.
Jain MK; Sankar K; Ramesh C; Bhatta R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e475-8. PubMed ID: 22487270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
Zix J; Lieger O; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1758-63. PubMed ID: 17719394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study.
Siddiqui A; Markose G; Moos KF; McMahon J; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 45(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 17110006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resorbable plates for the fixation of mandibular fractures: a prospective study.
Laughlin RM; Block MS; Wilk R; Malloy RB; Kent JN
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 17174770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular fracture osteosynthesis: a comparison of three techniques.
Renton TF; Wiesenfeld D
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Apr; 34(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 8861293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.
Gamit M; Patel Y; Sood R; Vadera H; Savjani K; Bhatti Z
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 37740128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of single versus two non-compression miniplates in the management of unfavourable angle fracture of the mandible: a prospective randomized clinical study.
Rai A; Jain A; Datarkar A
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(2):157-161. PubMed ID: 29460154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transoral 2.0-mm miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 2 weeks' maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
Bolourian R; Lazow S; Berger J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 60(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 11815915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative evaluation of different treatment modalities for parasymphysis fractures: a pilot study.
Saluja H; Kini Y; Mahindra U; Kharkar V; Rudagi BM; Dehane V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):906-11. PubMed ID: 22658265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between three-dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study.
Al-Moraissi EA; Mounair RM; El-Sharkawy TM; El-Ghareeb TI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 25457871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a single noncompression miniplate versus 2 noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Danda AK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1565-7. PubMed ID: 20430504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications.
Fox AJ; Kellman RM
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 14623682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of rectangular grid miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
Hochuli-Vieira E; Ha TK; Pereira-Filho VA; Landes CA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1436-41. PubMed ID: 21216065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of intermaxillary fixation screws and noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study.
Anslem O; Eyituoyo O; Olabode OV; Ademola OA; Adesina AO
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 28386782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.
Aggarwal S; Singh M; Modi P; Walia E; Aggarwal R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 28785906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical treatment of sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle using long-screw osteosynthesis.
Luo S; Li B; Long X; Deng M; Cai H; Cheng Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1988-94. PubMed ID: 21292375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
