149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22810047)
21. Single-embryo transfer.
Dhont M
Semin Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 19(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 11679906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Elective single embryo transfer - the Scandinavian experiment].
Galeraud-Denis I; Denoual-Ziad C; Muris-Guillou C; Benhaim A; Herlicoviez M
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1147-50. PubMed ID: 18951059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer.
López-Regalado ML; Clavero A; Gonzalvo MC; Serrano M; Martínez L; Mozas J; Rodríguez-Serrano F; Fontes J; Castilla JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():192-8. PubMed ID: 24798072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
De Neubourg D; Gerris J
Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 16410338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Single embryo implantation per IVF cycle: the answer to every request for assisted reproduction?].
Achten NMJ; Mol BW; Dondorp WJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2017; 161():D1887. PubMed ID: 29125083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Avoidance of multiple pregnancy by use of single embryo transfer.
Hamberger L; Hardarson T; Nygren KG
Minerva Ginecol; 2005 Feb; 57(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15758862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program.
Hernandez Torres E; Navarro-Espigares JL; Clavero A; López-Regalado M; Camacho-Ballesta JA; Onieva-García M; Martínez L; Castilla JA
Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 25557244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reducing multiple births in assisted reproduction technology.
Bhattacharya S; Kamath MS
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 24361002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Universal coverage of IVF pays off.
Vélez MP; Connolly MP; Kadoch IJ; Phillips S; Bissonnette F
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 24706002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.
Custers IM; König TE; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Kaaijk E; Oosterhuis J; Mochtar MH; Repping S; van Wely M; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study.
Hope N; Rombauts L
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 19442970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference.
Fiddelers AA; Nieman FH; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Evers JL; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2092-100. PubMed ID: 21546387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. When no choice of embryos exists, the multiple pregnancy risk is still high.
Wong VV; Emerson G; Mocanu E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Oct; 32(7):676-9. PubMed ID: 22943716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Incidence and zygosity of twin births following transfers using a single fresh or frozen embryo.
Osianlis T; Rombauts L; Gabbe M; Motteram C; Vollenhoven V
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1438-43. PubMed ID: 24760778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
