These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22810445)

  • 1. Efficient designs: factorial randomized trials.
    Whelan DB; Dainty K; Chahal J
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():34-8. PubMed ID: 22810445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design, analysis and presentation of factorial randomised controlled trials.
    Montgomery AA; Peters TJ; Little P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Nov; 3():26. PubMed ID: 14633287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive Bayesian randomized trials: realizing their potential.
    Pullenayegum EM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 22810444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A practical limit to trials needed in one-person randomized controlled experiments.
    Alemi R; Alemi F
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2007; 16(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 17426611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing Clinical Research Using Factorial Designs: A Primer.
    Baker TB; Smith SS; Bolt DM; Loh WY; Mermelstein R; Fiore MC; Piper ME; Collins LM
    Behav Ther; 2017 Jul; 48(4):567-580. PubMed ID: 28577591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factorial designs: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials.
    Pandis N; Walsh T; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 23885023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved Designs for Cluster Randomized Trials.
    Crespi CM
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2016; 37():1-16. PubMed ID: 26789386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design of surgical randomized controlled trials involving multiple interventions.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    J Surg Res; 2011 Jan; 165(1):118-27. PubMed ID: 20097373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Research: From Randomized Controlled Trials to Observational Studies.
    Wang X; Ji X
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S12-S20. PubMed ID: 32658647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging designs in orthopaedics: expertise-based randomized controlled trials.
    Scholtes VA; Nijman TH; van Beers L; Devereaux PJ; Poolman RW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():24-8. PubMed ID: 22810443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 2 × 2 cluster randomized controlled factorial trial design is mainly used for efficiency and to explore intervention interactions: a systematic review.
    Mdege ND; Brabyn S; Hewitt C; Richardson R; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1083-92. PubMed ID: 25063555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized two-stage Phase II clinical trial designs based on Barnard's exact test.
    Shan G; Ma C; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23957517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proposed variations of the stepped-wedge design can be used to accommodate multiple interventions.
    Lyons VH; Li L; Hughes JP; Rowhani-Rahbar A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():160-167. PubMed ID: 28412466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e141-6. PubMed ID: 21967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The tactics of large randomized trials.
    Slobogean GP; Sprague S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():19-23. PubMed ID: 22810442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strengthening the understanding of the relationship between survival designs and test statistics.
    Ma G; Ganju J
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 19507135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factorial experiments: efficient tools for evaluation of intervention components.
    Collins LM; Dziak JJ; Kugler KC; Trail JB
    Am J Prev Med; 2014 Oct; 47(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 25092122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of adaptive designs for single-armed phase II oncology trials.
    Kieser M; Englert S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):602-15. PubMed ID: 24905363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing the degrees of freedom in future group randomized trials: the df * method revisited.
    Murray DM; Blitstein JL; Hannan PJ; Shadish WR
    Eval Rev; 2012 Dec; 36(6):430-48. PubMed ID: 23640051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing trial efficiency by early reallocation of placebo nonresponders in sequential parallel comparison designs: application to antidepressant trials.
    Boessen R; Knol MJ; Groenwold RH; Grobbee DE; Roes KC
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 23060319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.