204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22810448)
1. The darker side of randomized trials: recruitment challenges.
Sibai T; Carlisle H; Tornetta P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():49-55. PubMed ID: 22810448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The tactics of large randomized trials.
Slobogean GP; Sprague S; Bhandari M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():19-23. PubMed ID: 22810442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pilot randomized trials: is there a need?
Jeray KJ; Tanner SL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():15-8. PubMed ID: 22810441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximizing Patient Recruitment and Retention in a Secondary Stroke Prevention Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned from the STAND FIRM Study.
Thayabaranathan T; Cadilhac DA; Srikanth VK; Fitzgerald SM; Evans RG; Kim J; Gerraty RP; Phan TG; Bladin CF; Nelson MR; Frayne JH; Thrift AG
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1371-80. PubMed ID: 27009610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to substantially increase recruitment in cancer trials in New Zealand.
Hadorn D; Wilson N; Edwards R; Blakely T; Sarfati D
N Z Med J; 2013 Aug; 126(1381):57-68. PubMed ID: 24150266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cluster randomized trials: opportunities and barriers identified by leaders of eight health plans.
Mazor KM; Sabin JE; Boudreau D; Goodman MJ; Gurwitz JH; Herrinton LJ; Raebel MA; Roblin D; Smith DH; Meterko V; Platt R
Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S29-37. PubMed ID: 17909379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues in the design of randomized trials: to sham or not to sham.
Dowrick AS; Bhandari M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():7-10. PubMed ID: 22810439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations for outcome-adaptive trial designs: a clinical researcher's perspective.
Saxman SB
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 24547903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges of randomized controlled surgical trials.
Campbell AJ; Bagley A; Van Heest A; James MA
Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 20399354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The design and use of cluster randomised controlled trials in evaluating injury prevention interventions: part 1. Rationale, design and informed consent.
DiGuiseppi C; Coupland C
Inj Prev; 2010 Feb; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20179039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recruitment difficulties in obstetric trials: a case study and review.
Madan A; Tracy S; Reid R; Henry A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 25350684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Common errors in the design of orthopaedic studies.
Bono CM; Tornetta P
Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 16473355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are randomized trials the best way to judge the efficacy of surgical procedures?
Gardner TJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 140(4):739-42. PubMed ID: 20850650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal radius fractures: current concepts.
Henry MH
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 33(7):1215-27. PubMed ID: 18762124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges in the design of a Home Telemanagement trial for patients with ulcerative colitis.
Cross RK; Finkelstein J
Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 19822631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges of cluster randomized trials.
Campbell MJ
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 24969154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenges Conveying Clinical Equipoise and Exploring Patient Treatment Preferences in an Oncology Trial Comparing Active Monitoring with Radiotherapy (ROAM/EORTC 1308).
Sherratt FC; Brown SL; Haylock BJ; Francis P; Hickey H; Gamble C; Jenkinson MD; Young B
Oncologist; 2020 Apr; 25(4):e691-e700. PubMed ID: 32045067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive Bayesian randomized trials: realizing their potential.
Pullenayegum EM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 22810444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The need to balance merits and limitations from different disciplines when considering the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
de Hoop E; van der Tweel I; van der Graaf R; Moons KG; van Delden JJ; Reitsma JB; Koffijberg H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():93. PubMed ID: 26514920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisiting sample size: are big trials the answer?
Lurati Buse GA; Botto F; Devereaux PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():75-9. PubMed ID: 22810453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
