These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22810808)

  • 1. Responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-J) and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after treatment of ulnocarpal abutment syndrome.
    Omokawa S; Imaeda T; Sawaizumi T; Momose T; Gotani H; Abe Y; Moritomo H; Kanaya F
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Sep; 17(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 22810808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture.
    MacDermid JC; Richards RS; Donner A; Bellamy N; Roth JH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 25(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 10722826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation.
    Imaeda T; Uchiyama S; Wada T; Okinaga S; Sawaizumi T; Omokawa S; Momose T; Moritomo H; Gotani H; Abe Y; Nishida J; Kanaya F;
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Jul; 15(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 20721719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome.
    Kim JK; Park ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 May; 471(5):1406-11. PubMed ID: 23404422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.
    Kim JK; Kang JS
    J Hand Ther; 2013; 26(3):238-43; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 23453368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of responsiveness of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument to surgical treatment with DASH, SF-36, and physical findings.
    Uchiyama S; Imaeda T; Toh S; Kusunose K; Sawaizumi T; Wada T; Okinaga S; Nishida J; Omokawa S; ;
    J Orthop Sci; 2007 May; 12(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 17530376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation.
    Hanyu T; Watanabe M; Masatomi T; Nishida K; Nakagawa T; Nishiura Y; Ohi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Sep; 18(5):712-9. PubMed ID: 23749174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius.
    Wilcke MT; Abbaszadegan H; Adolphson PY
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2009; 43(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 19308860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reliability of the Turkish "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire.
    Öztürk Ö; Sarı Z; Özgül B; Taşyıkan L
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 26012931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe).
    Mellstrand Navarro C; Ponzer S; Törnkvist H; Ahrengart L; Bergström G
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Jul; 12():171. PubMed ID: 21781287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire.
    Imaeda T; Toh S; Wada T; Uchiyama S; Okinaga S; Kusunose K; Sawaizumi T;
    J Orthop Sci; 2006 May; 11(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 16721524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Tuna Z; Mete O; Tore G; Baglan Yentur S; Varan Ö; Göker B; Oskay D
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1714-1718. PubMed ID: 31317675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Itsubo T; Uchiyama S; Momose T; Yasutomi T; Imaeda T; Kato H
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jan; 14(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19214683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE): cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties.
    John M; Angst F; Awiszus F; Pap G; Macdermid JC; Simmen BR
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2008; 26(6):1047-58. PubMed ID: 19210869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy.
    MacDermid JC; Tottenham V
    J Hand Ther; 2004; 17(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14770134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version).
    Wah JW; Wang MK; Ping CL
    J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(1):18-26, quiz 27. PubMed ID: 16473730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument.
    Imaeda T; Uchiyama S; Toh S; Wada T; Okinaga S; Sawaizumi T; Nishida J; Kusunose K; Omokawa S;
    J Orthop Sci; 2007 Jan; 12(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17260112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative responsiveness of Japanese versions of the DASH and SF-36 questionnaires and physical measurement to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release.
    Imaeda T; Hirata H; Toh S; Nakao Y; Nishida J; Ijichi M; Nagano A
    Hand Surg; 2006; 11(1-2):27-33. PubMed ID: 17080525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-related factors influencing ulnar-shortening osteotomy outcomes using the trimed dynamic compression plate.
    Viswanath P; Monaco NA; Lubahn JD
    Orthopedics; 2015 Feb; 38(2):e106-11. PubMed ID: 25665114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ulnocarpal abutment. Treatment options.
    Deitch MA; Stern PJ
    Hand Clin; 1998 May; 14(2):251-63. PubMed ID: 9604157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.