380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2281213)
21. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Extensive hearing loss and deafness in adults].
Laszig R
Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 8273025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.
Kuo SC; Gibson WP
Am J Otol; 2000 Sep; 21(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 10993454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Current state of knowledge: speech recognition and production in children with hearing impairment.
Eisenberg LS
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):766-72. PubMed ID: 17982364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Hearing rehabilitation, possibilities and limitations].
Ritsma RJ
Ned Tijdschr Gerontol; 1979 Aug; 10(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 492596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.
Psillas G; Psifidis A; Antoniadou-Hitoglou M; Kouloulas A
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 16420975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.
O'Donoghue GM; Nikolopoulos TP; Archbold SM; Tait M
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 9831151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids.
Miyamoto RT; Kirk KI; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():334-7. PubMed ID: 7668695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison between two perception tests in patients with severe and profoundly severe prelingual sensori-neural deafness.
Schindler A; Leonardi M; Cavallo M; Ottaviani F; Schindler O
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Apr; 23(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 14526553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of early hearing screening and treatment on language development and education level: evaluation of 6 years of universal newborn hearing screening (ALGO) in Flanders, Belgium.
Verhaert N; Willems M; Van Kerschaver E; Desloovere C
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 May; 72(5):599-608. PubMed ID: 18295908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Study of binaural interaction in sensorineural hearing loss in children in the light of electroacoustic correction of hearing].
Belov IM; Kuks EN; Ismagulova FSh
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1988; (5):59-63. PubMed ID: 3227593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Development of auditory handicap after a multi-electrode cochlear implantation].
Bergeron F; Ferron P
Union Med Can; 1991; 120(5):351-3. PubMed ID: 1962384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Initial findings with a wearable multichannel vibrotactile aid.
Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Todd SL; Brown CJ
Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():179-82. PubMed ID: 2069179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auditory detection of spondaic words in wide-band noise by adults with normal hearing and by children with profound hearing losses.
Erber NP
J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):372-81. PubMed ID: 5558093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Requirements on speech processing hearing aids for the profoundly deaf, some preliminary remarks.
Risberg A
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):179-98. PubMed ID: 292142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pseudoauditory air conduction thresholds in the deaf.
McGargill RL; Egan JJ; Babbitt DC
Audiology; 1977; 16(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 836254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech reception by the hearing-impaired: methods of testing and the development of new tests.
Levitt H; Resnick SB
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):107-30. PubMed ID: 292138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
