These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22812436)

  • 1. A systematic review of methods for tissue analysis in animal studies on orthodontic mini-implants.
    Gritsch K; Laroche N; Morgon L; Al-Hity R; Vico L; Colon P; Grosgogeat B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Aug; 15(3):135-47. PubMed ID: 22812436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies.
    Janssen KI; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Sandham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 18416415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical anisotropy of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Inaba M; Ueno S; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):972-7. PubMed ID: 19559569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review.
    Hoste S; Vercruyssen M; Quirynen M; Willems G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 19113080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics.
    Cornelis MA; Scheffler NR; De Clerck HJ; Tulloch JF; Behets CN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S52-8. PubMed ID: 17448386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
    Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mini-implants: pushing the limits of traditional orthodontics].
    Ellouze S
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Mar; 79(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 18364218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini-implants in clinical practice: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meursinge Reynders R; Ronchi L; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N; de Lange J; Roberts N; Mickan S
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():22. PubMed ID: 26846440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S15-23. PubMed ID: 25138361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between two orthodontic skeletal anchorage devices: osseointegrated implants and miniscrews - Medical-Legal Considerations.
    Costa A; Maric M; Danesino P
    Prog Orthod; 2006; 7(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16552453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using mini-screws for orthodontic anchorage.
    Fletcher JL
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2008; 19(3):25-9. PubMed ID: 18979703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontic practice. I--Introduction.
    Anka G
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 17203577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Versatility of skeletal anchorage in orthodontics.
    Lee TC; Leung MT; Wong RW; Rabie AB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 18834005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant vs screw loading protocols in orthodontics.
    Ohashi E; Pecho OE; Moron M; Lagravere MO
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 16808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective?
    Fudalej P; Antoszewska J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):722-9. PubMed ID: 21640877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical applications of mini-implants as orthodontic anchorage and the peri-implant tissue reaction upon loading.
    Cho HJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct; 34(10):813-20. PubMed ID: 17087396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic miniimplant used with revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experimental testing.
    Lin YS; Yu JH; Chang YZ; Lin CL
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23303268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peri-implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 1. A histomorphometric study of the effects of implant surface design.
    Oyonarte R; Pilliar RM; Deporter D; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16102401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.