These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22813783)
1. Next-generation low-cost motion capture systems can provide comparable spatial accuracy to high-end systems. Thewlis D; Bishop C; Daniell N; Paul G J Appl Biomech; 2013 Feb; 29(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22813783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Affordable clinical gait analysis: an assessment of the marker tracking accuracy of a new low-cost optical 3D motion analysis system. Carse B; Meadows B; Bowers R; Rowe P Physiotherapy; 2013 Dec; 99(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 23747027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems--exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. Windolf M; Götzen N; Morlock M J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2776-80. PubMed ID: 18672241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computation of the 3D kinematics in a global frame over a 40m-long pathway using a rolling motion analysis system. Begon M; Colloud F; Fohanno V; Bahuaud P; Monnet T J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2649-53. PubMed ID: 19800066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precision and repeatability of the Optotrak 3020 motion measurement system. States RA; Pappas E J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 16393848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the body scanner as a measuring tool for a rapid quantification of body shape. Bretschneider T; Koop U; Schreiner V; Wenck H; Jaspers S Skin Res Technol; 2009 Aug; 15(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 19624434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3D Joint Angles Measured With the Kinect 2.0 Skeletal Tracker Versus a Marker-Based Motion Capture System. Guess TM; Razu S; Jahandar A; Skubic M; Huo Z J Appl Biomech; 2017 Apr; 33(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 27918704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inertial measurement systems for segments and joints kinematics assessment: towards an understanding of the variations in sensors accuracy. Lebel K; Boissy P; Nguyen H; Duval C Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 28506273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Needle guidance using handheld stereo vision and projection for ultrasound-based interventions. Stolka PJ; Foroughi P; Rendina M; Weiss CR; Hager GD; Boctor EM Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 2):684-91. PubMed ID: 25485439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy, reproducibility, and comparability of Doppler tissue imaging by two high-end ultrasound systems. Kjaergaard J; Korinek J; Belohlavek M; Oh JK; Sogaard P; Hassager C J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Mar; 19(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 16500496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-comb-based interferometer for profilometry and tomography. Choi S; Yamamoto M; Moteki D; Shioda T; Tanaka Y; Kurokawa T Opt Lett; 2006 Jul; 31(13):1976-8. PubMed ID: 16770404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optical design of a variable view imaging system with the combination of a telecentric scanner and double wedge prisms. Tao X; Cho H; Janabi-Sharifi F Appl Opt; 2010 Jan; 49(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20062511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy, reliability, and validity of a spatiotemporal gait analysis system. Barker S; Craik R; Freedman W; Herrmann N; Hillstrom H Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jun; 28(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 16122966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and accuracy in three-dimensional gait analysis: a comparison of two lower body protocols. Stief F; Böhm H; Michel K; Schwirtz A; Döderlein L J Appl Biomech; 2013 Feb; 29(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 22813723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy. Yamazaki T; Watanabe T; Nakajima Y; Sugamoto K; Tomita T; Yoshikawa H; Tamura S IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 May; 23(5):602-12. PubMed ID: 15147013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A phantom study on the positioning accuracy of the Novalis Body system. Yan H; Yin FF; Kim JH Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3052-60. PubMed ID: 14713071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Passive markers for ultrasound tracking of surgical instruments. Stoll J; Dupont P Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):41-8. PubMed ID: 16685941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of imaging for laser triangulation sensors under Scheimpflug rule. Miks A; Novak J; Novak P Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(15):18225-35. PubMed ID: 23938693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Free-hand ultrasound scanning approaches for volume quantification of the mouse heart Left ventricle. Garson CD; Li Y; Hossack JA IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 May; 54(5):966-77. PubMed ID: 17523561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]