These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22814383)

  • 1. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
    Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
    Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
    Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
    Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
    Magnusson L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine Structure Processing improves speech perception as well as objective and subjective benefits in pediatric MED-EL COMBI 40+ users.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Obrycka A; Skarżynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 74(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 20933288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
    Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Galindo J; Lassaletta L; Mora RP; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Gavilán J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1223-9. PubMed ID: 22766835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; King ER; Deres EJ; Obarowski SN; Anderson ML; Adunka MC
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):263-270. PubMed ID: 27750737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-individual assessment of speech and music perception in cochlear implant users with contralateral Cochlear™ and MED-EL™ systems.
    Harris RL; Gibson WP; Johnson M; Brew J; Bray M; Psarros C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 131(12):1270-8. PubMed ID: 22074105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effects of temporal fine structure stimulation on Mandarin identification in cochlear implant users].
    Qi B; Liu B; Dong R; Krenmayr A; Chen X; Wang S
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 49(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 24931017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition outcomes in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with fine structure processing.
    Qi B; Liu Z; Gu X; Liu B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 137(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 27701966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification.
    Landwehr M; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23684531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.