651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22814561)
21. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.
Corrêa CB; Margonar R; Noritomi PY; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24355510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of implant inclination associated with mandibular class I removable partial denture.
de Freitas Santos CM; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; de Moraes SL; Falcón-Antenucci RM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):663-8. PubMed ID: 21415633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Finite element stress analysis of Ti-6Al-4V and partially stabilized zirconia dental implant during clenching.
Choi AH; Matinlinna JP; Ben-Nissan B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 21815837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
Lin CL; Wang JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Short threaded implants with an oxidized surface to restore posterior teeth: 1- to 3-year results of a prospective study.
De Santis D; Cucchi A; Longhi C; Vincenzo B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 21483893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study.
Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of 1-piece superstructure on mandibular flexure.
Naini RB; Nokar S
Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 22129961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
