These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22814780)

  • 1. Radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary angiograms performed by the radial compared with the femoral route.
    Kuipers G; Delewi R; Velders XL; Vis MM; van der Schaaf RJ; Koch KT; Henriques JP; de Winter RJ; Baan J; Tijssen JG; Piek JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jul; 5(7):752-7. PubMed ID: 22814780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and procedural characteristics associated with higher radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary angiography.
    Delewi R; Hoebers LP; Råmunddal T; Henriques JP; Angerås O; Stewart J; Robertsson L; Wahlin M; Petursson P; Piek JJ; Albertsson P; Matejka G; Omerovic E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 24065442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of fluoroscopy time during coronary angiography and interventions by radial and femoral routes- can we decrease the fluoroscopy time with increased experience? An observational study.
    Farman MT; Khan NU; Sial JA; Saghir T; Rizvi SN; Zaman KS
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2011 Nov; 11(7):607-12. PubMed ID: 21959874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.
    Ziakas AG; Koskinas KC; Gavrilidis S; Giannoglou GD; Hadjimiltiades S; Gourassas I; Theofilogiannakos E; Economou F; Styliadis I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20882651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Ricard C; Cattan S; Albert F; Hirsch JL; Monsegu J; Dibie A; Khalife K; Caussin C; Maccia C; Livarek B; Hanssen M;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 24323486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.
    Nadarasa K; Robertson MC; Wong CK; Green BK; Chen VH; Wilkins GT; Williams MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 21523899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16331696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of radiation dose and the effect of operator experience in femoral and radial arterial access for coronary procedures.
    Neill J; Douglas H; Richardson G; Chew EW; Walsh S; Hanratty C; Herity N
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Oct; 106(7):936-40. PubMed ID: 20854953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure).
    Pancholy SB; Joshi P; Shah S; Rao SV; Bertrand OF; Patel TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 26210808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
    Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operator Pelvic Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.
    Sciahbasi A; Piccaluga E; Sarandrea A; Nucci G; Caretto N; Rigattieri S; Fedele S; Romano S; Penco M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 30(2):71-74. PubMed ID: 29245152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study.
    Sciahbasi A; Romagnoli E; Burzotta F; Trani C; Sarandrea A; Summaria F; Pendenza G; Tommasino A; Patrizi R; Mazzari M; Mongiardo R; Lioy E
    Am Heart J; 2011 Jan; 161(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 21167351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay.
    Bundhoo SS; Earp E; Ivanauskiene T; Kunadian V; Freeman P; Edwards R; Kinnaird TD; Zaman A; Anderson RA
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23067903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.
    Rathore S; Roberts E; Hakeem AR; Pauriah M; Beaumont A; Morris JL
    J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 22(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 19689657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.
    Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Steg PG; Natarajan MK; Cheema AN; Rao SV; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Sheth T; Valentin V; Fung A; Widimsky P; Ferrari E; Gao P; Jedrzejowski B; Mehta SR;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23517837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the radial and femoral arterial approaches for coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction].
    Philippe F; Meziane T; Larrazet F; Dibie A
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Apr; 97(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 15182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study.
    Lo TS; Ratib K; Chong AY; Bhatia G; Gunning M; Nolan J
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 23067901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.