BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22815110)

  • 1. How well do diagnosis-related groups for appendectomy explain variations in resource use? An analysis of patient-level data from 10 European countries.
    Mason A; Or Z; Renaud T; Street A; Thuilliez J; Ward P;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():30-40. PubMed ID: 22815110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do diagnosis-related groups appropriately explain variations in costs and length of stay of hip replacement? A comparative assessment of DRG systems across 10 European countries.
    Geissler A; Scheller-Kreinsen D; Quentin W;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():103-15. PubMed ID: 22815116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis related groups and variations in resource use for child delivery across 10 European countries.
    Or Z; Renaud T; Thuilliez J; Lebreton C;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():55-65. PubMed ID: 22815112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DRGs in Europe: a cross country analysis for cholecystectomy.
    Paat-Ahi G; Swiderek M; Sakowski P; Saluse J; Aaviksoo A;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():66-76. PubMed ID: 22815113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of 10 European DRG systems in explaining variation in resource utilisation in inguinal hernia repair.
    O'Reilly J; Serdén L; Talbäck M; McCarthy B;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():89-101. PubMed ID: 22815115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do patients having coronary artery bypass grafts have different costs or length of stay? An analysis across 10 European countries.
    Gaughan J; Kobel C; Linhart C; Mason A; Street A; Ward P;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():77-88. PubMed ID: 22815114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient classification systems and hospital costs of care for knee replacement in 10 European countries.
    Cots F; Chiarello P; Salvador X; Castells X;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():116-28. PubMed ID: 22815117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How well do diagnosis-related group systems group breast cancer surgery patients? Evidence from 10 European countries.
    Scheller-Kreinsen D;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():41-54. PubMed ID: 22815111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient classification and hospital costs of care for stroke in 10 European countries.
    Peltola M;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():129-40. PubMed ID: 22815118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How well do diagnosis-related groups explain variations in costs or length of stay among patients and across hospitals? Methods for analysing routine patient data.
    Street A; Kobel C; Renaud T; Thuilliez J;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():6-18. PubMed ID: 22815108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient classification and hospital costs of care for acute myocardial infarction in nine European countries.
    Häkkinen U; Chiarello P; Cots F; Peltola M; Rättö H;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():19-29. PubMed ID: 22815109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis-related groups for stroke in Europe: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 countries.
    Peltola M; Quentin W
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 35(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23406838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do diagnosis-related groups explain variations in hospital costs and length of stay? Analyses from the EuroDRG project for 10 episodes of care across 10 European countries.
    Busse R;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():1-5. PubMed ID: 22815107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appendectomy and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries.
    Quentin W; Scheller-Kreinsen D; Geissler A; Busse R;
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2012 Feb; 397(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 22194037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital readmission after management of appendicitis at freestanding children's hospitals: contemporary trends and financial implications.
    Rice-Townsend S; Hall M; Barnes JN; Baxter JK; Rangel SJ
    J Pediatr Surg; 2012 Jun; 47(6):1170-6. PubMed ID: 22703789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Childbirth and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries.
    Bellanger MM; Quentin W; Tan SS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 May; 168(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 23375210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.
    Muldoon JH
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A micro-costing approach to estimating hospital costs for appendectomy in a cross-European context.
    Schreyögg J
    Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1 Suppl):S59-69. PubMed ID: 18186034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
    Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and analysis of unit cost estimation studies: How many hospital diagnoses? How many countries?
    Glick HA; Orzol SM; Tooley JF; Polsky D; Mauskopf JO
    Health Econ; 2003 Jul; 12(7):517-27. PubMed ID: 12825205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.