These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22815113)
1. DRGs in Europe: a cross country analysis for cholecystectomy. Paat-Ahi G; Swiderek M; Sakowski P; Saluse J; Aaviksoo A; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():66-76. PubMed ID: 22815113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis related groups and variations in resource use for child delivery across 10 European countries. Or Z; Renaud T; Thuilliez J; Lebreton C; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():55-65. PubMed ID: 22815112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How well do diagnosis-related groups for appendectomy explain variations in resource use? An analysis of patient-level data from 10 European countries. Mason A; Or Z; Renaud T; Street A; Thuilliez J; Ward P; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():30-40. PubMed ID: 22815110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient classification systems and hospital costs of care for knee replacement in 10 European countries. Cots F; Chiarello P; Salvador X; Castells X; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():116-28. PubMed ID: 22815117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do diagnosis-related groups appropriately explain variations in costs and length of stay of hip replacement? A comparative assessment of DRG systems across 10 European countries. Geissler A; Scheller-Kreinsen D; Quentin W; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():103-15. PubMed ID: 22815116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of 10 European DRG systems in explaining variation in resource utilisation in inguinal hernia repair. O'Reilly J; Serdén L; Talbäck M; McCarthy B; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():89-101. PubMed ID: 22815115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why do patients having coronary artery bypass grafts have different costs or length of stay? An analysis across 10 European countries. Gaughan J; Kobel C; Linhart C; Mason A; Street A; Ward P; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():77-88. PubMed ID: 22815114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How well do diagnosis-related group systems group breast cancer surgery patients? Evidence from 10 European countries. Scheller-Kreinsen D; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():41-54. PubMed ID: 22815111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient classification and hospital costs of care for stroke in 10 European countries. Peltola M; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():129-40. PubMed ID: 22815118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient classification and hospital costs of care for acute myocardial infarction in nine European countries. Häkkinen U; Chiarello P; Cots F; Peltola M; Rättö H; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():19-29. PubMed ID: 22815109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How well do diagnosis-related groups explain variations in costs or length of stay among patients and across hospitals? Methods for analysing routine patient data. Street A; Kobel C; Renaud T; Thuilliez J; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():6-18. PubMed ID: 22815108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis-related groups for stroke in Europe: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 countries. Peltola M; Quentin W Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 35(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23406838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with the open technic]. Charlo Dupont T; Fernández Martín M; Tejido Sánchez C Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1995 Jun; 87(6):449-52. PubMed ID: 7612367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do diagnosis-related groups explain variations in hospital costs and length of stay? Analyses from the EuroDRG project for 10 episodes of care across 10 European countries. Busse R; Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():1-5. PubMed ID: 22815107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients. Kelley JE; Burrus RG; Burns RP; Graham LD; Chandler KE Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8480927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Gallbladder and common bile duct calculi: treatment with laparoscopy vs laparotomy. Costs and benefits]. Melotti G; Bonilauri S; Lanzani A; Tamborrino E; Berselli T; Selmi I; Carretti A; Varoli M G Chir; 1993 Jul; 14(6):279-84. PubMed ID: 8398616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Opportunity for development of laparoscopic procedures in the hospital setting: costs and benefits for the surgical unit]. Vino F; Trerotoli P; Serio G Ann Ig; 2002; 14(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 12070898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: proper utilization can make this a cost effective technique. Chard RE J Health Soc Policy; 1999; 11(2):57-67. PubMed ID: 10620860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cost-effect evaluation of different variants of cholecystectomies]. Briskin BS; Lomidze OV Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2005; (6):24-30. PubMed ID: 16044122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]