These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22815376)
1. Left ventricular chamber dimensions and wall thickness by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Puntmann VO; Gebker R; Duckett S; Mirelis J; Schnackenburg B; Graefe M; Razavi R; Fleck E; Nagel E Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 14(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 22815376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance. Levy F; Dan Schouver E; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Marechaux S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):580-589. PubMed ID: 28566200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the accuracy of common clinical thresholds for cardiac morphology and function by transthoracic echocardiography. Alexis JA; Costello B; Iles LM; Ellims AH; Hare JL; Taylor AJ J Echocardiogr; 2017 Mar; 15(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 27817093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Datta S; Walls M; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; Tomson NA; Vidmar L; Georgescu B; Wang Y; Srinivasan S; De Michelis N; Raman SV; Ryan T; Vannan MA J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22105057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease. Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left ventricular thrombus formation after acute myocardial infarction as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Delewi R; Nijveldt R; Hirsch A; Marcu CB; Robbers L; Hassell ME; de Bruin RH; Vleugels J; van der Laan AM; Bouma BJ; Tio RA; Tijssen JG; van Rossum AC; Zijlstra F; Piek JJ Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3900-4. PubMed ID: 22995173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography: Investigation of Concordance between the Two Methods for Measurement of the Cardiac Chamber. Gürdoğan M; Ustabaşıoğlu FE; Kula O; Korkmaz S Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jun; 55(6):. PubMed ID: 31181857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of 2D transthoracic echocardiography with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Hendriks T; Al Ali L; Maagdenberg CG; van Melle JP; Hummel YM; Oudkerk M; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nijveldt R; van der Horst ICC; Lipsic E; van der Harst P Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():6-13. PubMed ID: 31005178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal Technique for Measurement of Linear Left Ventricular Dimensions. Chetrit M; Roujol S; Picard MH; Timmins L; Manning WJ; Rudski LG; Levine RA; Afilalo J J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Apr; 32(4):476-483.e1. PubMed ID: 30826223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrepancies in Left Ventricular Mass Calculation Based on Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Measurements in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Seo HY; Lee SP; Park JB; Lee JM; Park EA; Chang SA; Kim HK; Park SJ; Lee W; Kim YJ; Lee SC; Park SW; Sohn DW; Choe YH J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1194-1203, e2. PubMed ID: 26194306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Regional Upper Septal Hypertrophy on Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass and Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis. Guzzetti E; Tastet L; Annabi MS; Capoulade R; Shen M; Bernard J; García J; Le Ven F; Arsenault M; Bédard E; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 Jan; 34(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 33067075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ventricular Septal Measurements in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Who Underwent Surgical Myectomy Using Multimodality Imaging and Implications for Diagnosis and Management. Phelan D; Sperry BW; Thavendiranathan P; Collier P; Popović ZB; Lever HM; Smedira NG; Desai MY Am J Cardiol; 2017 May; 119(10):1656-1662. PubMed ID: 28363351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myocardial Dimensions in Children With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Comparison Between Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Windram JD; Dragelescu A; Benson L; Forsey J; Shariat M; Yoo SJ; Mertens L; Wong D; Grosse-Wortmann L Can J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1507-1512. PubMed ID: 27789109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative assessment of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in normal canine hearts. Fries RC; Gordon SG; Saunders AB; Miller MW; Hariu CD; Schaeffer DJ J Vet Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 21():79-92. PubMed ID: 30797448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography. Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CMR provides comparable measurements of diastolic function as echocardiography. Fujikura K; Sathya B; Acharya T; Benovoy M; Jacobs M; Sachdev V; Hsu LY; Arai AE Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11658. PubMed ID: 38778036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Cawley PJ; Hamilton-Craig C; Owens DS; Krieger EV; Strugnell WE; Mitsumori L; D'Jang CL; Schwaegler RG; Nguyen KQ; Nguyen B; Maki JH; Otto CM Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Differs Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography. Bois JP; Geske JB; Foley TA; Ommen SR; Pellikka PA Am J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 119(4):643-650. PubMed ID: 27956002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance. Soliman OI; Kirschbaum SW; van Dalen BM; van der Zwaan HB; Mahdavian Delavary B; Vletter WB; van Geuns RJ; Ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):778-83. PubMed ID: 18774006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]