These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22815876)

  • 1. A sparse neural code for some speech sounds but not for others.
    Scharinger M; Bendixen A; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Obleser J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40953. PubMed ID: 22815876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inequality across consonantal contrasts in speech perception: evidence from mismatch negativity.
    Cornell SA; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):757-72. PubMed ID: 23276108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children.
    Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ; Mahmoudian S; Ashayeri H; Allaeddini F; Farhadi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction in the service of comprehension: modulated early brain responses to omitted speech segments.
    Bendixen A; Scharinger M; Strauß A; Obleser J
    Cortex; 2014 Apr; 53():9-26. PubMed ID: 24561233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20381548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
    Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infants' brain responses for speech sound changes in fast multifeature MMN paradigm.
    Partanen E; Pakarinen S; Kujala T; Huotilainen M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Aug; 124(8):1578-85. PubMed ID: 23523115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Native language advantage in electrical brain responses to speech sound changes in passive and active listening condition.
    Yang T; Kurkela JLO; Chen K; Liu Y; Shu H; Cong F; Hämäläinen JA; Astikainen P
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Aug; 201():108936. PubMed ID: 38851314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
    Scharinger M; Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):903-18. PubMed ID: 22232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The mismatch negativity as an index of the perception of speech sounds by the human brain].
    Näätänen R
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2000 Nov; 86(11):1481-501. PubMed ID: 11195215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory discrimination profiles of speech sound changes in 6-year-old children as determined with the multi-feature MMN paradigm.
    Lovio R; Pakarinen S; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Silvennoinen S; Näätänen R; Kujala T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):916-21. PubMed ID: 19386542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERP mismatch response to phonological and temporal regularities in speech.
    Emmendorfer AK; Correia JM; Jansma BM; Kotz SA; Bonte M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9917. PubMed ID: 32555256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds.
    Pakarinen S; Lovio R; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change and novelty detection in speech and non-speech sound streams.
    Sorokin A; Alku P; Kujala T
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():77-90. PubMed ID: 20188710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vowel-speech versus pure-tone processing in healthy subjects.
    Iino H; Ohta K; Hara K; Miyajima M; Hara M; Matsushima E; Matsuura M
    Neurosci Res; 2018 Dec; 137():43-48. PubMed ID: 29630919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonological memory traces do not contain phonetic information.
    Rhodes R; Han C; Hestvik A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 30989583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm).
    Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11321610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Jansson-Verkasalo E; Eggers K; Järvenpää A; Suominen K; Van den Bergh B; De Nil L; Kujala T
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25066139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.