These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22816112)

  • 1. Risky research: The sky's the limit.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7407):395-7. PubMed ID: 22816112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A perverted view of "impact".
    Kirschner M
    Science; 2013 Jun; 340(6138):1265. PubMed ID: 23766298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research funding: the view from NIH.
    Insel TR; Volkow N; Li TK
    Am J Psychiatry; 2006 Dec; 163(12):2043-5. PubMed ID: 17151151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Researchers face 'Catch-22' grants trap.
    Ibáñez CF
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6725):280. PubMed ID: 10192324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. North America.
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S60-3. PubMed ID: 25390145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It is apparent that there has been a paradigm shift in the evaluation and funding of research. Interview by Dr. Rae Silver.
    Mitler M
    Horm Behav; 2006 Jun; 50(1):169-70. PubMed ID: 16616751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH abandons grant cap, offers new help to younger scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2017 Jun; 356(6343):1108. PubMed ID: 28619891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Worries over bioterrorism push.
    Dixon B
    Curr Biol; 2005 Apr; 15(7):R229-30. PubMed ID: 15864848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RO1s: an endangered species?
    Frank M
    Physiologist; 1992 Aug; 35(4):77-8. PubMed ID: 1409898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Starvation diet.
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7438):401-2. PubMed ID: 23451351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institutional obstacles to clinical research.
    Ahrens EH
    Perspect Biol Med; 1993; 36(2):194-209. PubMed ID: 8446491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Financial anatomy of neuroscience research.
    Fields H
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Jan; 63(1):124. PubMed ID: 17474111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On incentives for innovation.
    Alberts B
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.