392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22816657)
1. Systematic review of the impact of urinary tract infections on health-related quality of life.
Bermingham SL; Ashe JF
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E830-6. PubMed ID: 22816657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.
Meregaglia M; Cairns J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Mapping' Health State Utility Values from Non-preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Literature Review in Rare Diseases.
Meregaglia M; Whittal A; Nicod E; Drummond M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jun; 38(6):557-574. PubMed ID: 32152892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility Values for Adults with Unipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Mohiuddin S; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):666-85. PubMed ID: 24695961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to estimate health state utility values: mapping from the MSIS-29, version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D.
Hawton A; Green C; Telford C; Zajicek J; Wright D
Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1084-91. PubMed ID: 23244811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of different scenarios for intermittent bladder catheterization on health state utilities: results from an internet-based time trade-off survey.
Averbeck MA; Krassioukov A; Thiruchelvam N; Madersbacher H; Bøgelund M; Igawa Y
J Med Econ; 2018 Oct; 21(10):945-952. PubMed ID: 29882712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of utility measures for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Lee DD; Andy UU; Shea JA; Arya LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):119.e1-119.e8. PubMed ID: 28988907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the Health State Utility Value of Urinary Tract Infection in Women.
Kalyanaraman R; Demtchouk V; Iyer V; Patterson D
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):185-187. PubMed ID: 30807425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis.
Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of health-utility data for osteoarthritis: implications for clinical trial-based evaluation.
Ruchlin HS; Insinga RP
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(11):925-35. PubMed ID: 18850762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can The EQ-5D Detect Meaningful Change? A Systematic Review.
Payakachat N; Ali MM; Tilford JM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1137-54. PubMed ID: 26040242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review of health state utility values in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with a focus on previously treated patients.
Paracha N; Abdulla A; MacGilchrist KS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Sep; 16(1):179. PubMed ID: 30208899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research.
Whitehurst DG; Noonan VK; Dvorak MF; Bryan S
Spinal Cord; 2012 Sep; 50(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 22641255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Picot J; Jones J; Colquitt JL; Gospodarevskaya E; Loveman E; Baxter L; Clegg AJ
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19726018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.
Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG
Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.
Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D
Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health state values for use in the economic evaluation of treatments for Alzheimer's disease.
Shearer J; Green C; Ritchie CW; Zajicek JP
Drugs Aging; 2012 Jan; 29(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 22191721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic analysis of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of urinary tract infections in infants with high-grade hydronephrosis.
Tu HY; Pemberton J; Lorenzo AJ; Braga LH
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Oct; 11(5):247.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26174147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
