These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2281730)

  • 1. [Surgical statistics--an important performance record in surgery].
    Gastinger I; Eckhardt W; Herwig H
    Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(21):1381-9. PubMed ID: 2281730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].
    Schilling MK; Richter S; Jacob P; Lindemann W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Apr; 131(17):962-7. PubMed ID: 16673216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SCARS: a personal-computer-based surgical case record system.
    Lefor AT
    Resid Staff Physician; 1984 Aug; 30(8):73-5. PubMed ID: 10317488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent coding provides more accurate data for outcomes and performance reports.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):25-7, 17. PubMed ID: 10345330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Integral statistical classification of surgical operations - an essential factor for comparing the data of hospital statistics].
    Komarov BD; Falin VL
    Sov Med; 1975 May; (5):129-38. PubMed ID: 1145297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the medical record credential on data quality.
    Green E; Benjamin C
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):29-38. PubMed ID: 10280223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control--results of the first survey of pediatric surgery in Hungary].
    Dávidovics S
    Orv Hetil; 1997 Aug; 138(35):2181-3. PubMed ID: 9324679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of an evaluation framework for the quantitative assessment of computer-assisted surgery and augmented reality accuracy performance.
    Viant WJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():534-40. PubMed ID: 11317804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Rational EDP-basic documentation in the surgical clinic].
    Stock W; Nitzschke E; Mackrodt HG
    Chirurg; 1982 Mar; 53(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 7067540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Way to New Horizons: Telemedicine in Oncology.
    Schlag PM
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(2):III-IV. PubMed ID: 10388041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computers in a private surgeon's office. "Do it yourself" or "one is never served better than by oneself"].
    Constantin JM
    Ann Chir; 1996; 50(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 8758526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality policy of the Dutch Society for Surgery].
    de Vries BC; Keeman JN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Apr; 140(14):789-91. PubMed ID: 8668268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A method for systematic internal quality assurance in surgery].
    Küchle R; Junginger T
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of performance standards on job satisfaction among medical record department employees.
    Stich EK
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):60-4. PubMed ID: 10106094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of surgical performance: how to do it?].
    Fragata J
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2006; 13(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 17057825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic-assisted surgery.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2009 Nov; (421):1-16. PubMed ID: 19830933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery.
    Atherly A; Fink AS; Campbell DC; Mentzer RM; Henderson W; Khuri S; Culler SD
    Am J Surg; 2004 Nov; 188(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 15546571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.