156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22817789)
61. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position.
Lurix E; Hernandez AV; Thoma M; Castro F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 22321696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection.
Chen SC; Rex DK
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 42(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 18496392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Hyoscine N-butylbromide for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Rondonotti E; Radaelli F; Paggi S; Amato A; Imperiali G; Terruzzi V; Mandelli G; Lenoci N; Terreni NL; Baccarin A; Spinzi G
Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Aug; 45(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 23474349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.
Sawhney MS; Cury MS; Neeman N; Ngo LH; Lewis JM; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK; Aronson MD
Gastroenterology; 2008 Dec; 135(6):1892-8. PubMed ID: 18835390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.
Colquhoun P; Chen HC; Kim JI; Efron J; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Vernava AM; Wexner SD
Colorectal Dis; 2004 May; 6(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 15109378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Adenoma and polyp detection rates during insertion versus withdrawal phase of colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Chandan S; Mohan BP; Khan SR; Bhogal N; Ramai D; Bilal M; Aziz M; Shah AR; Mashiana HS; Jha LK; Bhat I; Singh S; Adler DG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Jan; 93(1):68-76.e2. PubMed ID: 32540312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy--a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis.
Rastogi A; Bansal A; Wani S; Callahan P; McGregor DH; Cherian R; Sharma P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Feb; 67(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 18155210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection.
Buchner AM; Shahid MW; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; McNeil RB; Cleveland P; Gill KR; Schore A; Ghabril M; Raimondo M; Gross SA; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1223-31. PubMed ID: 21481861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran's Administration teaching hospital.
Chan MY; Cohen H; Spiegel BM
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Nov; 7(11):1217-23; quiz 1143. PubMed ID: 19631284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study.
Le Rhun M; Coron E; Parlier D; Nguyen JM; Canard JM; Alamdari A; Sautereau D; Chaussade S; Galmiche JP
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Mar; 4(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 16527699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.
Lin OS; Kozarek RA; Arai A; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Kowdley KV; McCormick SE; Schembre DB; Soon MS; Dominitz JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jun; 71(7):1253-9. PubMed ID: 20598251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].
van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Colometer: a real-time quality feedback system for screening colonoscopy.
Filip D; Gao X; Angulo-RodrÃguez L; Mintchev MP; Devlin SM; Rostom A; Rosen W; Andrews CN
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4270-7. PubMed ID: 22969189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.
Leffler DA; Kheraj R; Bhansali A; Yamanaka H; Neeman N; Sheth S; Sawhney M; Lamont JT; Aronson MD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 22341102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Small colorectal serrated adenomas: endoscopic findings.
Jaramillo E; Watanabe M; Rubio C; Slezak P
Endoscopy; 1997 Jan; 29(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9083728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with gastric adenomas.
Yang MH; Son HJ; Lee JH; Kim MH; Kim JY; Kim YH; Chang DK; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Rhee JC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):774-81. PubMed ID: 20363417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.
Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Ho MN; O'Brien MJ; Gottlieb LS; Sternberg SS; Waye JD; Schapiro M; Bond JH; Panish JF
N Engl J Med; 1993 Dec; 329(27):1977-81. PubMed ID: 8247072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 Mar; 90(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 7872270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
