BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22817789)

  • 81. Is preoperative colonoscopy in carcinoma a realistic and valuable proposition?
    Bernard D; Tassé D; Morgan S; Wassef R
    Can J Surg; 1987 Mar; 30(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 3828916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Procedure Delays and Time of Day Are Not Associated With Reductions in Quality of Screening Colonoscopies.
    Keswani RN; Gawron AJ; Cooper A; Liss DT
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 14(5):723-8.e2. PubMed ID: 26538206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Segmental Withdrawal During Screening Colonoscopy Does Not Increase Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Avalos DJ; Jia Y; Zuckerman MJ; Michael M; Gonzalez-Martinez J; Mendoza-Ladd A; Garcia CJ; Sunny J; Delgado VC; Hernandez B; Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi IV; Dodoo C; Othman MO
    South Med J; 2020 Sep; 113(9):438-446. PubMed ID: 32885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved.
    Fritz CDL; Smith ZL; Elsner J; Hollander T; Early D; Kushnir V
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3120-3125. PubMed ID: 29721773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis.
    Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ruud HK; Glomsaker T; de Lange T; Sandvei P; Huppertz-Hauss G; Kjellevold Ø; Hoff G
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 22531983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Inspection and polypectomy during both insertion and withdrawal or only during withdrawal of colonoscopy?: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
    Wei Y; Shen G; Yang Y; Jin Z; Hu W; Zhu Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(27):e20775. PubMed ID: 32629658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Oral IBGard™ Before Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
    Han JY; Moosvi Z; Duh E; Park S; Albers GC; Samarasena JB; Karnes W
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 May; 66(5):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 32519140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. One or two operator technique and quality performance of colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Paggi S; Rondonotti E; Amato A; Baccarin A; Spinzi G; Radaelli F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jul; 46(7):616-20. PubMed ID: 24721107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Effect of propofol anesthesia on force application during colonoscopy.
    Korman LY; Haddad NG; Metz DC; Brandt LJ; Benjamin SB; Lazerow SK; Miller HL; Mete M; Patel M; Egorov V
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Apr; 79(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 24472761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Routine rectal retroflexion during colonoscopy has a low yield for neoplasia.
    Saad A; Rex DK
    World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Nov; 14(42):6503-5. PubMed ID: 19030202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion.
    Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 109(9):1401-3. PubMed ID: 25196871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Water-aided colonoscopy.
    Leung FW
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 42(3):507-19. PubMed ID: 23931857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. [Not Available].
    Lesur G
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):965. PubMed ID: 26693529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review.
    Leung FW; Amato A; Ell C; Friedland S; Harker JO; Hsieh YH; Leung JW; Mann SK; Paggi S; Pohl J; Radaelli F; Ramirez FC; Siao-Salera R; Terruzzi V
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Sep; 76(3):657-66. PubMed ID: 22898423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Colon adenoma surveillance: it takes a program.
    Lieberman D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):479-81. PubMed ID: 25127945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Farewell to the cap or is there still an indication?
    Kanakadandi V; Rastogi A
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):873-5. PubMed ID: 26417969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Assessing colonoscopic inspection skill using a virtual withdrawal simulation: a preliminary validation of performance metrics.
    Zupanc CM; Wallis GM; Hill A; Burgess-Limerick R; Riek S; Plooy AM; Horswill MS; Watson MO; de Visser H; Conlan D; Hewett DG
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jul; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 28701200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. The influence of colonoscopy on the operative management of colorectal cancer.
    Askew A; Ward M; Cowen A
    Med J Aust; 1986 Sep; 145(6):254-5. PubMed ID: 3747911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Retrospective comparison of sedated and non-sedated colonoscopy in an outpatient practice.
    Al-Zubaidi AM; Al-Shadadi AA; Alghamdy HU; Alzobady AH; Al-Qureshi LA; Al-Bakri IM
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 35(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 27138929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Diagnostic value of novel retroflexion colonoscopy in the right colon: A randomized controlled trial.
    Li WK; Wang Y; Wang YD; Liu KL; Guo CM; Su H; Liu H; Wu J
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Nov; 12(11):1336-1345. PubMed ID: 33250965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.