These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22818475)

  • 21. Genetic analysis of reproductive disorders and their relationship to fertility and milk yield in Austrian Fleckvieh dual-purpose cows.
    Koeck A; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Obritzhauser W; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2185-94. PubMed ID: 20412934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genotype-by-environment interactions at the trait level and total merit index level for milk production and functional traits in Brown Swiss cattle.
    Schmid M; Imort-Just A; Emmerling R; Fuerst C; Hamann H; Bennewitz J
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100052. PubMed ID: 33516040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A variance component estimation approach to infer associations between Mendelian polledness and quantitative production and female fertility traits in German Simmental cattle.
    Scheper C; Emmerling R; Götz KU; König S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Jul; 53(1):60. PubMed ID: 34261443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic associations of test-day fat:protein ratio with milk yield, fertility, and udder health traits in Nordic Red cattle.
    Negussie E; Strandén I; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Feb; 96(2):1237-50. PubMed ID: 23260017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selection for profit in cattle: I. Economic weights for purebred dairy cattle in the Czech Republic.
    Wolfová M; Wolf J; Kvapilík J; Kica J
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2442-55. PubMed ID: 17430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross-sectional analyses of a national database to determine if superior genetic merit translates to superior dairy cow performance.
    Ring SC; Evans RD; Cromie AR; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8076-8093. PubMed ID: 33896640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimates of genetic trend for yield traits of the registered Jersey population.
    Nizamani AH; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Mar; 79(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 8708112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection for female fertility using censored fertility traits and investigation of the relationship with milk production.
    González-Recio O; Alenda R; Chang YM; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Nov; 89(11):4438-44. PubMed ID: 17033033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
    Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Su G; Ma P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Wiggans G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 26330119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
    Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
    Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 2. Incorporating methane emissions into the breeding goal.
    González-Recio O; López-Paredes J; Ouatahar L; Charfeddine N; Ugarte E; Alenda R; Jiménez-Montero JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Aug; 103(8):7210-7221. PubMed ID: 32475662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variation in the actual preferences for AI bull traits among Finnish dairy herds.
    Paakala E; Martín-Collado D; Mäki-Tanila A; Juga J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Oct; 135(6):410-419. PubMed ID: 30334292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproductive technologies combine well with genomic selection in dairy breeding programs.
    Thomasen JR; Willam A; Egger-Danner C; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Feb; 99(2):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 26686703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calving interval and survival breeding values as measure of cow fertility in a pasture-based production system with seasonal calving.
    Olori VE; Meuwissen TH; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):689-96. PubMed ID: 11949876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.