135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22819404)
1. National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty.
Sukumar S; Sun M; Karakiewicz PI; Friedman AA; Chun FK; Sammon J; Ghani KR; Ravi P; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Peabody JO; Elder JS; Menon M; Trinh QD
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):913-8. PubMed ID: 22819404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.
Monn MF; Bahler CD; Schneider EB; Sundaram CP
J Urol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):1352-7. PubMed ID: 23063631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Knoedler J; Han L; Granberg C; Kramer S; Chow G; Gettman M; Kimball B; Moriarty J; Kim S; Husmann D
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1141-7. PubMed ID: 23510261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.
Vemulakonda VM; Cowan CA; Lendvay TS; Joyner BD; Grady RW
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. PubMed ID: 18708209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Jacobs BL; Kaufman SR; Morgenstern H; Hollenbeck BK; Wolf JS; Hollingsworth JM
J Endourol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 22967009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary trends in surgical correction of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: data from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Nelson CP; Park JM; Dunn RL; Wei JT
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 15592083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
Casale P
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a horseshoe kidney.
Talug C; Perlmutter AE; Kumar T; Zaslau S; Tarry WF
Can J Urol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):3773-5. PubMed ID: 18163934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
Jacobs BL; Seelam R; Lai JC; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27927021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results.
Eden CG
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):983-9. PubMed ID: 17629395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Miniature pyeloplasty as a minimally invasive surgery with less than 1 day admission in infants.
Kajbafzadeh AM; Tourchi A; Nezami BG; Khakpour M; Mousavian AA; Talab SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2011 Jun; 7(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 21527237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Zhang X; Li HZ; Ma X; Zheng T; Lang B; Zhang J; Fu B; Xu K; Guo XL
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 16890694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty.
Liu DB; Ellimoottil C; Flum AS; Casey JT; Gong EM
J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Aug; 10(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 25082711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.
Lucas SM; Sundaram CP; Wolf JS; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG; Aziz M; Pautler SE; Luke P; Erdeljan P; Baldwin DD; Ebrahimi K; Nadler RB; Rebuck D; Thomas R; Lee BR; Boylu U; Figenshau RS; Munver R; Averch TD; Gayed B; Shalhav AL; Gundeti MS; Castle EP; Anderson JK; Duffey BG; Landman J; Okhunov Z; Wong C; Strom KH
J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 22177178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
