515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22819409)
1. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reoperative Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children: Safety and Efficacy of the Technique.
Moscardi PR; Barbosa JA; Andrade HS; Mello MF; Cezarino BN; Oliveira LM; Srougi M; Dénes FT; Lopes RI
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):798-804. PubMed ID: 27789217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Reoperative Repair for Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: An Updated Series.
Jacobson DL; Shannon R; Johnson EK; Gong EM; Liu DB; Flink CC; Meyer T; Cheng EY; Lindgren BW
J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 30395839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience.
Sivaraman A; Leveillee RJ; Patel MB; Chauhan S; Bracho JE; Moore CR; Coelho RF; Palmer KJ; Schatloff O; Bird VG; Munver R; Patel VR
Urology; 2012 Feb; 79(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 22173173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience.
Olsen LH; Rawashdeh YF; Jorgensen TM
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2137-41; discussion 2141. PubMed ID: 17870122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.
Lee RS; Retik AB; Borer JG; Peters CA
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):683-7; discussion 687. PubMed ID: 16407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial.
Penn HA; Gatti JM; Hoestje SM; DeMarco RT; Snyder CL; Murphy JP
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):690-5. PubMed ID: 20639039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
