229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22821445)
1. Promoting consultation recording practice in oncology: identification of critical implementation factors and determination of patient benefit.
Hack TF; Ruether JD; Weir LM; Grenier D; Degner LF
Psychooncology; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1273-82. PubMed ID: 22821445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Study protocol: addressing evidence and context to facilitate transfer and uptake of consultation recording use in oncology: a knowledge translation implementation study.
Hack TF; Ruether JD; Weir LM; Grenier D; Degner LF
Implement Sci; 2011 Mar; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21401958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of providing audiotapes of primary adjuvant treatment consultations to women with breast cancer: a multisite, randomized, controlled trial.
Hack TF; Pickles T; Bultz BD; Ruether JD; Weir LM; Degner LF; Mackey JR
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4138-44. PubMed ID: 14615442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of providing audiotapes of primary treatment consultations to men with prostate cancer: a multi-site, randomized, controlled trial.
Hack TF; Pickles T; Bultz BD; Ruether JD; Degner LF
Psychooncology; 2007 Jun; 16(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 16991107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Behind closed doors II: systematic analysis of prostate cancer patients' primary treatment consultations with radiation oncologists and predictors of satisfaction with communication.
Hack TF; Ruether JD; Pickles T; Bultz BD; Chateau D; Degner LF
Psychooncology; 2012 Aug; 21(8):809-17. PubMed ID: 21557385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The addition of an audiocassette recording of a consultation to written recommendations for patients with advanced cancer: A randomized, controlled trial.
Bruera E; Pituskin E; Calder K; Neumann CM; Hanson J
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2420-5. PubMed ID: 10590386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behind closed doors: systematic analysis of breast cancer consultation communication and predictors of satisfaction with communication.
Hack TF; Pickles T; Ruether JD; Weir L; Bultz BD; Degner LF
Psychooncology; 2010 Jun; 19(6):626-36. PubMed ID: 19514095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial.
Brown RF; Butow PN; Dunn SM; Tattersall MH
Br J Cancer; 2001 Nov; 85(9):1273-9. PubMed ID: 11720460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors.
Siminoff LA; Graham GC; Gordon NH
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Sep; 62(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 16860520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology.
Hack TF; Whelan T; Olivotto IA; Weir L; Bultz BD; Magwood B; Ashbury F; Brady J
Psychooncology; 2007 Apr; 16(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 16906625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Audio Recording of Initial Patient Visits to an Ocular Oncology Clinic: A Pilot Study.
Seider MI; Damato BE
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2015 May; 46(5):597-9. PubMed ID: 26057768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different perspectives on communication quality and emotional functioning during routine oncology consultations.
Fagerlind H; Kettis A; Bergström I; Glimelius B; Ring L
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 22261005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consultation audio-tapes: an information aid, and a quality assurance and research tool.
Tattersall MH
Support Care Cancer; 2002 Apr; 10(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11904786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomised clinical trial of providing patients with audiotape recordings of their oesophagogastric cancer consultations.
Stephens MR; Gaskell AL; Gent C; Pellard S; Day-Thompson R; Blackshaw GR; Lewis WG
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 18513915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discussing adjuvant cancer therapy.
Leighl N; Gattellari M; Butow P; Brown R; Tattersall MH
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Mar; 19(6):1768-78. PubMed ID: 11251008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An examination of the initial cancer consultation of medical and radiation oncologists using the Cancode interaction analysis system.
Dimoska A; Butow PN; Dent E; Arnold B; Brown RF; Tattersall MH
Br J Cancer; 2008 May; 98(9):1508-14. PubMed ID: 18454160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Providing patients with an audio recording of the outpatient oncological consultation; experiences of patients and physicians].
Ong LM; de Haes JC; Kruyver IP; de Reijke TM; Lammes FB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 7838223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do radiation oncologists tailor information to patients needs? And, if so, does it affect patients?
Douma KF; Koning CC; de Haes HC; Zandbelt LC; Stalpers LJ; Smets EM
Acta Oncol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):512-20. PubMed ID: 22414096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians.
Sepucha KR; Belkora JK; Mutchnick S; Esserman LJ
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 20(11):2695-700. PubMed ID: 12039932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context?
Butow P; Juraskova I; Chang S; Lopez AL; Brown R; Bernhard J
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Feb; 78(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 19647966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
