169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22822200)
1. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.
Resnik DB; Ness E
J Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 38(12):746-50. PubMed ID: 22822200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research.
Miller FG; Gluck JP; Wendler D
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 18935922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral accountability and debriefing.
Benham B
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):253-73. PubMed ID: 18935923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research with human subjects.
Ackerman TF
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(5):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role and responsibilities of witnesses in the informed consent process.
Angeles-Llerenas AR; Wirtz V; Lara-Alvarez CF
Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18370932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The therapeutic misconception, beneficence, and respect.
Fried E
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):331-48. PubMed ID: 12481794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement to participate in research: is that a promise?
Newton LH
IRB; 1984; 6(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research participation as a contract.
Lawson C
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Counterfactual Consent and the Use of Deception in Research.
Wilson AT
Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):470-7. PubMed ID: 25425459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician duties in the conduct of human subject research.
Fried E
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):349-75. PubMed ID: 12481789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
Pellegrino ED
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to withdraw from research.
Schaefer GO; Wertheimer A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 21338028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What should subjects be told about withdrawing from a protocol?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):39-49. PubMed ID: 21534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deception in social research I: kinds of deception and the wrongs they may involve.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1982 Nov; 4(9):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Expanding the frame of "voluntariness" in informed consent: structural coercion and the power of social and economic context.
Fisher JA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Dec; 23(4):355-79. PubMed ID: 24552076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics?: conceptual clarifications.
Rehbock T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Oct; 20(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21843383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
