These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2282363)

  • 1. Towards a new professionalism.
    Mufson RA
    New Biol; 1990 Aug; 2(8):655-6. PubMed ID: 2282363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health policy report. Some further notes on congressional oversight of the NIH.
    Hatch OG; Waxman HA
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(15):967-8. PubMed ID: 4033737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The President vetoes stricter congressional oversight of NIH.
    Iglehart JK
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Nov; 311(22):1452-6. PubMed ID: 6493311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A boost for women's health research.
    Santorum SR
    Hosp Outlook; 1998 Mar; 1(3):9. PubMed ID: 10186075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Embryonic stem cell research and U.S. policy.
    Rao MS
    Stem Cells; 2006 Jun; 24(6):1412-3. PubMed ID: 16687466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Troublesome questions.
    Civin CI
    Stem Cells; 2006 Jun; 24(6):1411. PubMed ID: 16687465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biotechnology transfer at the National Institutes of Health.
    Chen PS
    Qual Assur; 1993 Dec; 2(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 7952969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Report of the AFCR Public Policy Committee: current issues in public policy.
    Clin Res; 1986 Apr; 34(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 3709060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US stem cell policy comes under fire.
    Fletcher L
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):893-4. PubMed ID: 11581638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does exclusion or inclusion better protect women?
    Shultz MM
    J Gend Specif Med; 1998; 1(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11281007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The healthcare bubble through the lens of pain research, practice, and policy: advice for the new President and Congress.
    Green CR
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1071-3. PubMed ID: 19038768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A role for the federal government in the development of a research base in the allied health professions.
    Sarfaty M
    J Allied Health; 1989; 18(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 2737934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Congress debates stem cell research.
    Novak K
    Nat Med; 2000 Jun; 6(6):614. PubMed ID: 10835663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists fight for right to withhold data.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6719):459. PubMed ID: 10028957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limits placed on embryo research.
    Hosp Ethics; 1995; 11(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 10139937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graduate education in laboratory animal medicine at the University of Missouri.
    Middleton CC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1970 Dec; 157(11):1950-2. PubMed ID: 5536742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Federal support of education and research: policy issues and national needs.
    Marston RQ
    Yale J Biol Med; 1969 Aug; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 5346698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opposition to new marijuana research rules.
    Cimons M
    Nat Med; 2000 Jan; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 10613805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task force set up to combat threat of political interference.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The current status of burn research.
    Baxter CR
    J Trauma; 1974 Jan; 14(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 4809716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.