These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22824119)

  • 1. Difficulties and errors in diagnosis of breast neoplasms.
    Giess CS; Frost EP; Birdwell RL
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2012 Aug; 33(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 22824119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
    Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
    Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
    Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patterns of nonmasslike enhancement at screening breast MR imaging of high-risk premenopausal women.
    Giess CS; Raza S; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1343-60. PubMed ID: 24025928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
    Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
    Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
    Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
    Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: multimodality imaging and histopathologic assessment.
    Choi BB; Shu KS
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 22090465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancers detected by breast MRI screening and ultrasound in asymptomatic Asian women: 8 years of experience in Taiwan.
    Cheng YC; Wu NY; Ko JS; Lin PW; Lin WC; Juang SJ; Tsai TT; Chang CY; Chen JH; Cheng HC
    Oncology; 2012; 82(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 22328009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies.
    Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R
    Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: an Australian feasibility study.
    Peters G; Anderson J; Longman G; Thomson J; Taylor D; Bennett M; Wylie E; Goldblatt J; Chan A; Saunders C
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18373823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.