These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22825082)

  • 1. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear.
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):45.e1-9. PubMed ID: 21620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
    Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.
    Kjerulff KH; Attanasio LB; Edmonds JK; Repke JT
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Jun; 28(6):874-884. PubMed ID: 30412449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
    Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Mészáros G; Töreki A; Keresztúri A; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1025-33. PubMed ID: 25066090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual violence and mode of delivery: a population-based cohort study.
    Henriksen L; Schei B; Vangen S; Lukasse M
    BJOG; 2014 Sep; 121(10):1237-44. PubMed ID: 24939396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits?
    Liu X; Landon MB; Cheng W; Chen Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):817.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25640048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section.
    Rortveit G; Daltveit AK; Hannestad YS; Hunskaar S;
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Mar; 348(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 12621134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-initiated elective cesarean section of nulliparous women in British Columbia, Canada.
    Hutton EK; Kornelsen J
    Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 23281899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.
    Ryding EL; Lukasse M; Kristjansdottir H; Steingrimsdottir T; Schei B;
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):75-83. PubMed ID: 27269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway.
    Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM; Nyland Bjørgo M; Lukasse M; Schei B; Henriksen L
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():206-212. PubMed ID: 29804768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.