These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22825358)

  • 1. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.
    Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When alternative hypotheses shape your beliefs: Context effects in probability judgments.
    Cai X; Pleskac TJ
    Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105306. PubMed ID: 36379148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generating and evaluating options for decision making: the impact of sequentially presented evidence.
    Sprenger A; Dougherty MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):550-75. PubMed ID: 22082233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Replicating a simple study of asymmetry in human cognition.
    Anderson JA; Grice JW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Oct; 109(2):577-80. PubMed ID: 20038011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment.
    Moore AB; Clark BA; Kane MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):549-57. PubMed ID: 18578844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.
    Block RA; Hancock PA; Zakay D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):330-43. PubMed ID: 20403583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of base rates and new information in an abstract hypothesis-testing task.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; Russo S; D'Addario M; Cherubini P
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 23560666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consider the alternative: The effects of causal knowledge on representing and using alternative hypotheses in judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):723-39. PubMed ID: 26569437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
    Conway P; Gawronski B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of analytic and experiential modes of thought on moral judgment.
    Kvaran T; Nichols S; Sanfey A
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():187-96. PubMed ID: 23317833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.