122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2282565)
1. Prevalence of cesarean section in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 1984-1989.
Hsieh CC; Hsieh TT; Soong YK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1990 Dec; 13(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 2282565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
Bouillin D; Fournier G; Gueye A; Diadhiou F; Cissé CT
Sante; 1994; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality.
Silver RM
Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 23009962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: a meta-analysis.
Segal S; Su M; Gilbert P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):974-8. PubMed ID: 11035349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
Soliman SR; Burrows RF
CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.
Stafford RS
West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 2260286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?
Gregory KD; Henry OA; Gellens AJ; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 8090395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
Myers SA; Gleicher N
N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality.
Solheim KN; Esakoff TF; Little SE; Cheng YW; Sparks TN; Caughey AB
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Nov; 24(11):1341-6. PubMed ID: 21381881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.
Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Liss T
Am J Public Health; 1987 Aug; 77(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 3605474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risks preceding increased primary cesarean birth rates.
Sokol RJ; Rosen MG; Bottoms SF; Chik L
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 59(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 7078881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
