BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22826030)

  • 1. A transition model for quality-of-life data with non-ignorable non-monotone missing data.
    Liao K; Freres DR; Troxel AB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3444-66. PubMed ID: 22826030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A copula model for repeated measurements with non-ignorable non-monotone missing outcome.
    Shen C; Weissfeld L
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2427-40. PubMed ID: 16143999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pseudo-likelihood methods for longitudinal binary data with non-ignorable missing responses and covariates.
    Parzen M; Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Ibrahim JG; Troxel A
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2784-96. PubMed ID: 16345018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A random-effects Markov transition model for Poisson-distributed repeated measures with non-ignorable missing values.
    Li J; Yang X; Wu Y; Shoptaw S
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2519-32. PubMed ID: 17106918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multistate Markov chain model for longitudinal, categorical quality-of-life data subject to non-ignorable missingness.
    Cole BF; Bonetti M; Zaslavsky AM; Gelber RD
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2317-34. PubMed ID: 15977292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-response models for the analysis of non-monotone ignorable missing data.
    Robins JM; Gill RD
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):39-56. PubMed ID: 9004382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of non-ignorable missing and left-censored longitudinal data using a weighted random effects tobit model.
    Sattar A; Weissfeld LA; Molenberghs G
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(27):3167-80. PubMed ID: 21898524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginalized transition models for longitudinal binary data with ignorable and non-ignorable drop-out.
    Kurland BF; Heagerty PJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2673-95. PubMed ID: 15316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Markov transition models for binary repeated measures with ignorable and nonignorable missing values.
    Xiaowei Yang ; Shoptaw S; Kun Nie ; Juanmei Liu ; Belin TR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):347-64. PubMed ID: 17715161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Handling missing responses in generalized linear mixed model without specifying missing mechanism.
    Zhang H; Paik MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1001-17. PubMed ID: 20183461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for bias due to a non-ignorable tracing mechanism in a retrospective breast cancer cohort study.
    Titman AC; Lancaster GA; Carmichael K; Scutt D
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(4):324-34. PubMed ID: 21225895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A correlated random-effects model for normal longitudinal data with nonignorable missingness.
    Lin H; Liu D; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 19941316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of longitudinal Gaussian data with missing data on the response variable].
    Jacqmin-Gadda H; Commenges D; Dartigues J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Dec; 47(6):525-34. PubMed ID: 10673586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation study to assess statistical methods for binary repeated measures data.
    Masaoud E; Stryhn H
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Feb; 93(2-3):81-97. PubMed ID: 20004989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An index of local sensitivity to non-ignorability for multivariate longitudinal mixed data with potential non-random dropout.
    Mahabadi SE; Ganjali M
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(17):1779-92. PubMed ID: 20658547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias correction of two-state latent Markov process parameter estimates under misclassification.
    Rosychuk RJ; Thompson ME
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):2035-55. PubMed ID: 12802821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity analysis for the estimation of rates of change with non-ignorable drop-out: an application to a randomized clinical trial of the vitamin D3.
    Matsuyama Y
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):811-27. PubMed ID: 12587107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inference for case-control studies when exposure status is both informatively missing and misclassified.
    Lyles RH; Allen AS; Dana Flanders W; Kupper LL; Christensen DL
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(23):4065-80. PubMed ID: 16463349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mixed-effects model for cognitive decline with non-monotone non-response from a two-phase longitudinal study of dementia.
    Shen C; Gao S
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(2):409-25. PubMed ID: 16345034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of relative improvement due to weights within generalized estimating equations framework for incomplete clinical trials data.
    Demirtas H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):1085-98. PubMed ID: 15587981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.