244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22826208)
1. Individual and family characteristics associated with BRCA1/2 genetic testing in high-risk families.
Katapodi MC; Northouse LL; Milliron KJ; Liu G; Merajver SD
Psychooncology; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1336-43. PubMed ID: 22826208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences between women who pursued genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and their at-risk relatives who did not.
Katapodi MC; Northouse L; Pierce P; Milliron KJ; Liu G; Merajver SD
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Sep; 38(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 21875844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress.
van Oostrom I; Meijers-Heijboer H; Duivenvoorden HJ; Bröcker-Vriends AH; van Asperen CJ; Sijmons RH; Seynaeve C; Van Gool AR; Klijn JG; Tibben A
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 16872788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer.
Hallowell N; Foster C; Eeles R; Ardern-Jones A; Watson M
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Aug; 59(3):553-65. PubMed ID: 15144764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.
Geller G; Doksum T; Bernhardt BA; Metz SA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Apr; 8(4 Pt 2):377-83. PubMed ID: 10207643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.
Bottorff JL; Ratner PA; Balneaves LG; Richardson CG; McCullum M; Hack T; Chalmers K; Buxton J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 11815405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result.
Vos J; Gómez-García E; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Stoel RD; van Asperen CJ; Jansen AM; Stiggelbout AM; Tibben A
Psychooncology; 2012 Jan; 21(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 21072753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.
Armstrong K; Calzone K; Stopfer J; Fitzgerald G; Coyne J; Weber B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Nov; 9(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 11097234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
Schwartz MD; Lerman C; Brogan B; Peshkin BN; Isaacs C; DeMarco T; Halbert CH; Pennanen M; Finch C
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Apr; 14(4):1003-7. PubMed ID: 15824179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opinion about reproductive decision making among individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a multicentre Spanish cohort.
Fortuny D; Balmaña J; Graña B; Torres A; Ramón y Cajal T; Darder E; Gadea N; Velasco A; López C; Sanz J; Alonso C; Brunet J
Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 19112076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interest and attitudes of patients, cancer physicians, medical students and cancer researchers towards a spectrum of genetic tests relevant to breast cancer patients.
Ngoi N; Lee SC; Hartman M; Khin LW; Wong A
Breast; 2013 Feb; 22(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22560561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands.
Schwartz MD; Hughes C; Roth J; Main D; Peshkin BN; Isaacs C; Kavanagh C; Lerman C
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Apr; 9(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 10794482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population.
Armstrong K; Weber B; Ubel PA; Guerra C; Schwartz JS
Prev Med; 2002 Jun; 34(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 12052018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell.
Patenaude AF; Dorval M; DiGianni LS; Schneider KA; Chittenden A; Garber JE
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 24(4):700-6. PubMed ID: 16446344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.
van Oostrom I; Meijers-Heijboer H; Duivenvoorden HJ; Bröcker-Vriends AH; van Asperen CJ; Sijmons RH; Seynaeve C; van Gool AR; Klijn JG; Tibben A
Clin Genet; 2007 Jan; 71(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 17204044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer.
van Dijk S; Timmermans DR; Meijers-Heijboer H; Tibben A; van Asperen CJ; Otten W
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 24(22):3672-7. PubMed ID: 16877736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uptake of offer to receive genetic information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an Australian population-based study.
Keogh LA; Southey MC; Maskiell J; Young MA; Gaff CL; Kirk J; Tucker KM; Rosenthal D; McCredie MR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2258-63. PubMed ID: 15598789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the family cluster effect on psychosocial variables in families undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
Lapointe J; Abdous B; Camden S; Bouchard K; Goldgar D; Simard J; Dorval M
Psychooncology; 2012 May; 21(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 21370312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations to the incidence of breast cancer in young women: results from a prospective population-based study in France.
Bonadona V; Sinilnikova OM; Chopin S; Antoniou AC; Mignotte H; Mathevet P; Brémond A; Martin A; Bobin JY; Romestaing P; Raudrant D; Rudigoz RC; Léoné M; Chauvin F; Easton DF; Lenoir GM; Lasset C
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2005 Aug; 43(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 15887246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in women of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
Casey MJ; Synder C; Bewtra C; Narod SA; Watson P; Lynch HT
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 15863145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
