BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22826561)

  • 1. Percutaneous cardiac support devices for cardiogenic shock: current indications and recommendations.
    Ouweneel DM; Henriques JP
    Heart; 2012 Aug; 98(16):1246-54. PubMed ID: 22826561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: current concepts and future directions.
    Briceno N; Kapur NK; Perera D
    Heart; 2016 Sep; 102(18):1494-507. PubMed ID: 27503999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Mandawat A; Rao SV
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Rab T; O'Neill W
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2019 Oct; 29(7):410-417. PubMed ID: 30573276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-aortic balloon pump trials: questions, answers, and unresolved issues.
    Perera D; Lumley M; Pijls N; Patel MR
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 23780295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Review of percutaneous mechanical support devices and strategies.
    Dudzinsk JE; Gnall E; Kowey PR
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 31032599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Telukuntla KS; Estep JD
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 32280415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Reyentovich A; Barghash MH; Hochman JS
    Nat Rev Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):481-92. PubMed ID: 27356877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
    Dhar G; Jolly N
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome: Ready for Prime Time?
    Schurtz G; Laine M; Delmas C; Kerbaul F; Puymirat E; Lemesle G; Bonello L
    Curr Vasc Pharmacol; 2018; 16(5):418-426. PubMed ID: 29345584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current status of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.
    Basra SS; Loyalka P; Kar B
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 26(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 21926617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revascularisation and mechanical circulatory support in patients with ischaemic cardiogenic shock.
    Maznyczka AM; Ford TJ; Oldroyd KG
    Heart; 2019 Sep; 105(17):1364-1374. PubMed ID: 31129613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective.
    Atkinson TM; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Rab T; Cigarroa JE;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):871-83. PubMed ID: 27151604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: pharmacologic and mechanical hemodynamic support pathways.
    Graf T; Desch S; Eitel I; Thiele H
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Sep; 26(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 25968304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mechanical support in cardiogenic shock].
    Graf T; Thiele H
    Herz; 2015 Apr; 40(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 25737288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Agarwal S; Sud K; Martin JM; Menon V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1772-4. PubMed ID: 26585627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of mechanical assist during high-risk PCI and STEMI with cardiogenic shock.
    Cyrus T; Mathews SJ; Lasala JM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75 Suppl 1():S1-6. PubMed ID: 20333708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.
    Idelchik GM; Simpson L; Civitello AB; Loyalka P; Gregoric ID; Delgado R; Kar B
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Jan; 27(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 18187095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.