These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22826597)
1. QFracture is better than FRAX tool in assessing risk of hip fracture. Johansen A BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4988. PubMed ID: 22826597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study. Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. Hippisley-Cox J; Coupland C BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3427. PubMed ID: 22619194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women. Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM; BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting fracture risk in osteoporosis: the use of fracture prediction tools in an osteoporosis clinic population. Aw D; Thain J; Ali A; Aung T; Chua WM; Sahota O; Weerasuriya N; Marshall L; Kearney F; Masud T Postgrad Med J; 2016 May; 92(1087):267-70. PubMed ID: 26792635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FRAX-based Estimates of 10-year Probability of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fracture Among Adults Aged 40 and Over: United States, 2013 and 2014. Looker AC; Sarafrazi Isfahani N; Fan B; Shepherd JA Natl Health Stat Report; 2017 Mar; (103):1-16. PubMed ID: 28459415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort. González-Macías J; Marin F; Vila J; Díez-Pérez A Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 22129640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the FRAX model for hip fracture predictions in the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE). Sund R; Honkanen R; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey E; Kanis J; Kröger H Calcif Tissue Int; 2014 Jul; 95(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 24792689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The characteristics of osteoporotic fractures in the region of Bialystok (BOS-2). The application of the WHO algorithm, FRAX®BMI and FRAX®BMD assessment tools to determine patients for intervention. Badurski J; Jeziernicka E; Dobreńko A; Nowak N; Daniluk S; Rybaczuk M; Wiśniowiecka M Endokrynol Pol; 2011; 62(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 21879467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures in Primary Care: Development and Validation of the FRA-HS Algorithm. Francesco L; Elisa B; Raffaella M; Alessandro P; Iacopo C; Giampiero M; Bruno F; Daniel PA; Luisa BM; Claudio C Calcif Tissue Int; 2017 Jun; 100(6):537-549. PubMed ID: 28160026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of hip fracture in Romania and the development of a Romanian FRAX model. Grigorie D; Sucaliuc A; Johansson H; Kanis JA; McCloskey E Calcif Tissue Int; 2013 May; 92(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 23334302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores. Cummins NM; Poku EK; Towler MR; O'Driscoll OM; Ralston SH Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Aug; 89(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 21647704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is It Possible to Increase the Clinical Effectiveness of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Osteopenia Patients by Taking Into Account Bone Mineral Density Values? Park JS; Lee J; Park YS J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 26822485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men. Yu R; Leung J; Woo J J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Derivation and validation of the CFracture competing risk fracture prediction tool compared with QFracture in older people and people with comorbidity: a population cohort study. Livingstone SJ; Guthrie B; McMinn M; Eke C; Donnan PT; Morales DR Lancet Healthy Longev; 2023 Jan; 4(1):e43-e53. PubMed ID: 36610448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway. Hoff M; Meyer HE; Skurtveit S; Langhammer A; Søgaard AJ; Syversen U; Dhainaut A; Skovlund E; Abrahamsen B; Schei B Osteoporos Int; 2017 Oct; 28(10):2935-2944. PubMed ID: 28668994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gait speed and one-leg standing time each add to the predictive ability of FRAX. Lundin H; Sääf M; Strender LE; Nyren S; Johansson SE; Salminen H Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 27844133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Epidemiology of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fractures in a Dutch Population of Community-Dwelling Elderly: Implications for the Dutch FRAX® Algorithm. Klop C; Welsing PM; Leufkens HG; Elders PJ; Overbeek JA; van den Bergh JP; Bijlsma JW; de Vries F PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143800. PubMed ID: 26633011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]