These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22826619)

  • 1. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.
    Beaulieu D; Barkun A; Martel M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3551-7. PubMed ID: 22826619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective intervention study of colonoscopy reporting among patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.
    Beaulieu D; Martel M; Barkun AN
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 26(10):718-22. PubMed ID: 23061065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening polypectomy rates below quality benchmarks: a prospective study.
    Sewitch MJ; Jiang M; Fon Sing M; Barkun A; Joseph L
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(43):16300-5. PubMed ID: 25473187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center.
    Vemulapalli KC; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 24796960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.
    Buchner AM; Guarner-Argente C; Ginsberg GG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 22657404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality in colonoscopy reporting: an assessment of compliance and performance improvement.
    Coe SG; Panjala C; Heckman MG; Patel M; Qumseya BJ; Wang YR; Dalton B; Tran P; Palmer W; Diehl N; Wallace MB; Raimondo M
    Dig Liver Dis; 2012 Aug; 44(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22579446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.
    Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Fletcher RH; Stillman JS; O'brien MJ; Levin B; Smith RA; Lieberman DA; Burt RW; Levin TR; Bond JH; Brooks D; Byers T; Hyman N; Kirk L; Thorson A; Simmang C; Johnson D; Rex DK
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2006; 56(3):143-59; quiz 184-5. PubMed ID: 16737947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
    Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.
    de Jonge V; Sint Nicolaas J; Cahen DL; Moolenaar W; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; van Tilburg AJ; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 21907986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closing the Gap: A Critical Examination of Adherence, Inconsistency, and Improvements in Colonoscopy Reporting Practices.
    Lux TJ; Herold K; Kafetzis I; Sodmann P; Sassmanshausen Z; Meining A; Hann A
    Digestion; 2024; 105(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 38479373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician assessment and management of complex colon polyps: a multicenter video-based survey study.
    Aziz Aadam A; Wani S; Kahi C; Kaltenbach T; Oh Y; Edmundowicz S; Peng J; Rademaker A; Patel S; Kushnir V; Venu M; Soetikno R; Keswani RN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 109(9):1312-24. PubMed ID: 25001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The appropriateness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals after polypectomy.
    Schreuders E; Sint Nicolaas J; de Jonge V; van Kooten H; Soo I; Sadowski D; Wong C; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23378981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.
    Atkin W; Wooldrage K; Brenner A; Martin J; Shah U; Perera S; Lucas F; Brown JP; Kralj-Hans I; Greliak P; Pack K; Wood J; Thomson A; Veitch A; Duffy SW; Cross AJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Jun; 18(6):823-834. PubMed ID: 28457708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resect and discard approach to colon polyps: real-world applicability among academic and community gastroenterologists.
    Vu HT; Sayuk GS; Hollander TG; Clebanoff J; Edmundowicz SA; Gyawali CP; Thyssen EP; Weinstock LB; Early DS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Feb; 60(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 25287002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colonoscopic surveillance after curative colorectal resection: results of an empirical surveillance programme.
    McFall MR; Woods WG; Miles WF
    Colorectal Dis; 2003 May; 5(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 12780884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
    Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surveillance colonoscopies frequently booked earlier than the National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines: findings of a single centre audit.
    Bunjo Z; Koh YH; Leopardi L; Reid J; Maddern GJ; Hewett PJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Mar; 89(3):E61-E65. PubMed ID: 30706618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia.
    Gondal G; Grotmol T; Hofstad B; Bretthauer M; Eide TJ; Hoff G
    Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1193-7. PubMed ID: 16329016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the size of colorectal polyps endoscopically: random guess or systematic error?
    Liang J; Church JM
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):612-616. PubMed ID: 36300611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.