These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827163)

  • 1. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterising ChIP-seq binding patterns by model-based peak shape deconvolution.
    Mendoza-Parra MA; Nowicka M; Van Gool W; Gronemeyer H
    BMC Genomics; 2013 Nov; 14(1):834. PubMed ID: 24279297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discovering transcription factor binding sites in highly repetitive regions of genomes with multi-read analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Chung D; Kuan PF; Li B; Sanalkumar R; Liang K; Bresnick EH; Dewey C; Keleş S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002111. PubMed ID: 21779159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Jain D; Baldi S; Zabel A; Straub T; Becker PB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):6959-68. PubMed ID: 26117547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AREM: aligning short reads from ChIP-sequencing by expectation maximization.
    Newkirk D; Biesinger J; Chon A; Yokomori K; Xie X
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1495-505. PubMed ID: 22035330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A signal processing approach for enriched region detection in RNA polymerase II ChIP-seq data.
    Han Z; Tian L; Pécot T; Huang T; Machiraju R; Huang K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. PubMed ID: 22536865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates.
    Newell R; Pienaar R; Balderson B; Piper M; Essebier A; Bodén M
    Genomics; 2021 Jul; 113(4):1855-1866. PubMed ID: 33878366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PePr: a peak-calling prioritization pipeline to identify consistent or differential peaks from replicated ChIP-Seq data.
    Zhang Y; Lin YH; Johnson TD; Rozek LS; Sartor MA
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(18):2568-75. PubMed ID: 24894502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls.
    Chitpin JG; Awdeh A; Perkins TJ
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3592-3598. PubMed ID: 30824903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saturation analysis of ChIP-seq data for reproducible identification of binding peaks.
    Hansen P; Hecht J; Ibrahim DM; Krannich A; Truss M; Robinson PN
    Genome Res; 2015 Sep; 25(9):1391-400. PubMed ID: 26163319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A manually curated ChIP-seq benchmark demonstrates room for improvement in current peak-finder programs.
    Rye MB; Sætrom P; Drabløs F
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Mar; 39(4):e25. PubMed ID: 21113027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Fast Cluster Motif Finding Algorithm for ChIP-Seq Data Sets.
    Zhang Y; Wang P
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():218068. PubMed ID: 26236718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data.
    Jothi R; Cuddapah S; Barski A; Cui K; Zhao K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Sep; 36(16):5221-31. PubMed ID: 18684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HPeak: an HMM-based algorithm for defining read-enriched regions in ChIP-Seq data.
    Qin ZS; Yu J; Shen J; Maher CA; Hu M; Kalyana-Sundaram S; Yu J; Chinnaiyan AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jul; 11():369. PubMed ID: 20598134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extracting transcription factor targets from ChIP-Seq data.
    Tuteja G; White P; Schug J; Kaestner KH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Sep; 37(17):e113. PubMed ID: 19553195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving ChIP-seq peak-calling for functional co-regulator binding by integrating multiple sources of biological information.
    Osmanbeyoglu HU; Hartmaier RJ; Oesterreich S; Lu X
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 22369349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of C2H2-ZF binding preferences from ChIP-seq data using RCADE.
    Najafabadi HS; Albu M; Hughes TR
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2879-81. PubMed ID: 25953800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HiChIP: a high-throughput pipeline for integrative analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Yan H; Evans J; Kalmbach M; Moore R; Middha S; Luban S; Wang L; Bhagwate A; Li Y; Sun Z; Chen X; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):280. PubMed ID: 25128017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.