330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827380)
41. Amphibian Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Moving from Technology to Application.
Clulow J; Upton R; Trudeau VL; Clulow S
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1200():413-463. PubMed ID: 31471805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics.
Ouborg NJ; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Bijlsma RK; Hedrick PW
Trends Genet; 2010 Apr; 26(4):177-87. PubMed ID: 20227782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Role of Reproductive Sciences in the Preservation and Breeding of Commercial and Threatened Teleost Fishes.
Mayer I
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1200():187-224. PubMed ID: 31471798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Perspectives for feed-efficient animal production.
Niemann H; Kuhla B; Flachowsky G
J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):4344-63. PubMed ID: 21705634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Preservation of endangered species and populations: a role for genome banking, somatic cell cloning, and androgenesis?
Corley-Smith GE; Brandhorst BP
Mol Reprod Dev; 1999 Jul; 53(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 10369397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. An overview of genomics research and its impact on livestock reproduction.
Rohrer GA
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2004; 16(1-2):47-54. PubMed ID: 14972102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Computer simulations to determine the efficacy of different genome resource banking strategies for maintaining genetic diversity.
Harnal VK; Wildt DE; Bird DM; Monfort SL; Ballou JD
Cryobiology; 2002 Apr; 44(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 12151267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pedigree analysis of 5 swine breeds in the United States and the implications for genetic conservation.
Welsh CS; Stewart TS; Schwab C; Blackburn HD
J Anim Sci; 2010 May; 88(5):1610-8. PubMed ID: 20190174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Development of national animal genetic resource programs.
Blackburn HD
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2004; 16(1-2):27-32. PubMed ID: 14972100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Livestock biodiversity: from genes to animal products through safeguard actions.
Caroli AM; Pizzi F
Theor Biol Forum; 2012; 105(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 23757954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes.
de Cara MA; Fernández J; Toro MA; Villanueva B
J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22059579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Swine gene banking: a quality control perspective on collection, and analysis of samples for a national repository.
Purdy PH
Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1304-9. PubMed ID: 18640707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Importance of reproductive biotechnology in cattle in Europe].
Wrenzycki C; Stinshoff H
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2015; 43(2):115-22; quiz 123. PubMed ID: 25812702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Application of sperm sorting and associated reproductive technology for wildlife management and conservation.
O'Brien JK; Steinman KJ; Robeck TR
Theriogenology; 2009 Jan; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 19010523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reproductive biotechnologies for endangered mammalian species.
Comizzoli P; Mermillod P; Mauget R
Reprod Nutr Dev; 2000; 40(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 11140819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Genetic diversity of European cattle breeds highlights the conservation value of traditional unselected breeds with high effective population size.
Medugorac I; Medugorac A; Russ I; Veit-Kensch CE; Taberlet P; Luntz B; Mix HM; Förster M
Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(16):3394-410. PubMed ID: 19659482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Optimizing ex situ genetic resource collections for European livestock conservation.
De Oliveira Silva R; Ahmadi BV; Hiemstra SJ; Moran D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jan; 136(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 30536957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Genome resource banking for wildlife research, management, and conservation.
Wildt DE
ILAR J; 2000; 41(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 11123183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of Vietnamese and European pig breeds using microsatellites.
Thuy NT; Melchinger-Wild E; Kuss AW; Cuong NV; Bartenschlager H; Geldermann H
J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2601-8. PubMed ID: 16971559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Marker-assisted conservation of European cattle breeds: An evaluation.
European Cattle Genetic Diversity Consortium
Anim Genet; 2006 Oct; 37(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 16978177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
