115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827386)
1. Reproduction in farm animals in an era of rapid genetic change: will genetic change outpace our knowledge of physiology?
Foxcroft GR
Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Aug; 47 Suppl 4():313-9. PubMed ID: 22827386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows.
Hoving LL; Soede NM; Graat EA; Feitsma H; Kemp B
Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Oct; 122(1-2):82-9. PubMed ID: 20727690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate.
Su G; Lund MS; Sorensen D
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17339413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential gene expression in ovaries of pregnant pigs with high and low prolificacy levels and identification of candidate genes for litter size.
Fernandez-Rodriguez A; Munoz M; Fernandez A; Pena RN; Tomas A; Noguera JL; Ovilo C; Fernandez AI
Biol Reprod; 2011 Feb; 84(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 20926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic selection for lifetime reproductive performance.
Clutter AC
Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2009; 66():293-302. PubMed ID: 19848295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Genetic analysis of sow productivity traits].
Chu MX; Wu CX; Zhang JS; Gu JP; Sun SQ
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2000; 27(11):947-52. PubMed ID: 11209687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits.
Bloemhof S; van der Waaij EH; Merks JW; Knol EF
J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3330-7. PubMed ID: 18708608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic basis of prolificacy in Meishan pigs.
Haley CS; Lee GJ
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():247-59. PubMed ID: 8145208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of polymorphisms in candidate genes on reproduction traits in Finnish pig populations.
Sironen AI; Uimari P; Serenius T; Mote B; Rothschild M; Vilkki J
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):821-7. PubMed ID: 19933427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic associations of sow longevity with age at first farrowing, number of piglets weaned, and wean to insemination interval in the Finnish Landrace swine population.
Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Fernando RL
J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3324-9. PubMed ID: 18676729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow.
Yuan TL; Zhu YH; Shi M; Li TT; Li N; Wu GY; Bazer FW; Zang JJ; Wang FL; Wang JJ
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2015 Jun; 16(6):417-35. PubMed ID: 26055904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple manifestations of season on reproductive performance of commercial swine.
Xue JL; Dial GD; Marsh WE; Davies PR
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1994 May; 204(9):1486-9. PubMed ID: 8050978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for sow productivity.
Irvin KM; Swiger LA
J Anim Sci; 1984 May; 58(5):1144-50. PubMed ID: 6539771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy.
Legault C
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1985; 33():151-66. PubMed ID: 3910822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanisms of regulation of litter size in pigs on the genome level.
Distl O
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():10-6. PubMed ID: 17688597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
