These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827386)

  • 21. Application of transcriptomic analyses to reproductive studies in contemporary commercial sows.
    Foxcroft GR; Silva PV; Paradis F
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 26515280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recent advances in pig reproduction: Focus on impact of genetic selection for female fertility.
    Kemp B; Da Silva CLA; Soede NM
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2018 Sep; 53 Suppl 2():28-36. PubMed ID: 30238653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selection for litter size and litter birthweight in Large White pigs: Maximum, mean and variability of reproduction traits.
    Sell-Kubiak E
    Animal; 2021 Oct; 15(10):100352. PubMed ID: 34534762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A genetic analysis of sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1149-63. PubMed ID: 6542565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics.
    Canario L; Cantoni E; Le Bihan E; Caritez JC; Billon Y; Bidanel JP; Foulley JL
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Dec; 84(12):3185-96. PubMed ID: 17093210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of candidate regions influencing litter size in Danish Landrace sows.
    Bjerre D; Mark T; Sørensen P; Proschowsky HF; Vernersen A; Jørgensen CB; Fredholm M
    J Anim Sci; 2010 May; 88(5):1603-9. PubMed ID: 20118429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of sow nutrition during gestation on within-litter birth weight variation: a review.
    Campos PH; Silva BA; Donzele JL; Oliveira RF; Knol EF
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 22558927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits.
    Ferguson PW; Harvey WR; Irvin KM
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Feb; 60(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 4039308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influencing prolificacy of sows by selection for physiological factors.
    Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Lamberson WR; Sasaki S
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1985; 33():139-49. PubMed ID: 3910821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic approaches to the improvement of fertility traits in the pig.
    Spötter A; Distl O
    Vet J; 2006 Sep; 172(2):234-47. PubMed ID: 16426876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative aspects of placental efficiency.
    Wilson ME; Ford SP
    Reprod Suppl; 2001; 58():223-32. PubMed ID: 11980192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An increased feed intake during early pregnancy improves sow body weight recovery and increases litter size in young sows.
    Hoving LL; Soede NM; van der Peet-Schwering CM; Graat EA; Feitsma H; Kemp B
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3542-50. PubMed ID: 21705632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The addition of ground wheat straw as a fiber source in the gestation diet of sows and the effect on sow and litter performance for three successive parities.
    Veum TL; Crenshaw JD; Crenshaw TD; Cromwell GL; Easter RA; Ewan RC; Nelssen JL; Miller ER; Pettigrew JE; Ellersieck MR;
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):1003-12. PubMed ID: 18952734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Increased sow nutrition during midgestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality, with no consequences on growth performance.
    Cerisuelo A; Baucells MD; Gasa J; Coma J; Carrión D; Chapinal N; Sala R
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):729-39. PubMed ID: 18952720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Farrowing rates and litter size following transfer of vitrified porcine embryos into a commercial swine herd.
    Cameron RD; Beebe LF; Blackshaw AW; Keates HL
    Theriogenology; 2004 May; 61(7-8):1533-43. PubMed ID: 15036983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prenatal programming of postnatal development in the pig.
    Foxcroft GR; Dixon WT; Dyck MK; Novak S; Harding JC; Almeida FC
    Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2009; 66():213-31. PubMed ID: 19848290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GENOMICS SYMPOSIUM: Using genomic approaches to uncover sources of variation in age at puberty and reproductive longevity in sows.
    Wijesena HR; Lents CA; Riethoven JJ; Trenhaile-Grannemann MD; Thorson JF; Keel BN; Miller PS; Spangler ML; Kachman SD; Ciobanu DC
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Sep; 95(9):4196-4205. PubMed ID: 28992028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetics of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in the Finnish Landrace and Large White pig populations.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3111-7. PubMed ID: 15542456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.