117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827562)
1. Comparative analysis of cesarean delivery rates over a 10-year period in a single Institution using 10-class classification.
Ciriello E; Locatelli A; Incerti M; Ghidini A; Andreani M; Plevani C; Regalia A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2717-20. PubMed ID: 22827562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.
Ferreira EC; Pacagnella RC; Costa ML; Cecatti JG
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 25704253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ratio of transfer cesarean section after trial of labor and maternal-fetal adverse outcomes based on Robson classifications].
Sun W; Wang XY; Yu L; Lin L; Zhang HL; Zhou YM; Su CH; Chen DJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):512-515. PubMed ID: 31461806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal antenatal body mass index gains as predictors of large-for-gestational-age infants and cesarean deliveries in Japanese singleton pregnancies.
Takimoto H; Sugiyama T; Nozue M; Kusama K; Fukuoka H; Kato N; Yoshiike N
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jun; 37(6):553-62. PubMed ID: 21375666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital.
Amatya A; Paudel R; Poudyal A; Wagle RR; Singh M; Thapa S
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):255-8. PubMed ID: 24908526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the Robson's classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3.
Gerli S; Favilli A; Franchini D; De Giorgi M; Casucci P; Parazzini F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jan; 31(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 28056581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the 10-Group Classification System to analyze how the population control policy change in China has affected cesarean delivery.
Zhang Y; Gu N; Wang Z; Zheng M; Hu Y; Dai Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 138(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 28502115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of untrained labor companion with operative delivery rate: retrospective study of 2247 women.
Tempfer-Bentz EK; Froese G; Gong Y; Hinterkirchner E; Kohl M; Heinze G; Tempfer CB
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Sep; 20(9):1367-71. PubMed ID: 21751878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor.
Bergholt T; Lim LK; Jørgensen JS; Robson MS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):163.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Birth complications, overweight, and physical inactivity.
Voldner N; Frøslie KF; Haakstad LA; Bø K; Henriksen T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 19277916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates at three university hospital labor units using the Robson classification system.
Zahumensky J; Psenkova P; Nemethova B; Halasova D; Kascak P; Korbel M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jul; 146(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 31058314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System.
Abdel-Aleem H; Shaaban OM; Hassanin AI; Ibraheem AA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 123(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 23958586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Hauth JC; Bloom S; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed ID: 16157104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.
Eftekharian C; Husslein PW; Lehner R
Matern Child Health J; 2021 Sep; 25(9):1474-1481. PubMed ID: 34181155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cesarean delivery at term in low risk pregnancies: effects on neonatal morbidity].
Ceriani Cernadas JM; Mariani G; Pardo A; Aguirre A; Pérez C; Brener P; Cores Ponte FA
Arch Argent Pediatr; 2010 Feb; 108(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 20204235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.
Caughey AB; Nicholson JM; Cheng YW; Lyell DJ; Washington AE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 16949399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robson Ten Group Classification System applied to women with severe maternal morbidity.
Ferreira EC; Costa ML; Cecatti JG; Haddad SM; Parpinelli MA; Robson MS;
Birth; 2015 Mar; 42(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 25676792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
