These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827717)

  • 21. Interaction between mode of learning and subjective experience: translation effects in long-term memory.
    Rackie JM; Brandt KR; Eysenck MW
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 24528147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The production effect: costs and benefits in free recall.
    Jones AC; Pyc MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):300-5. PubMed ID: 23751006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Production Improves Visual and Auditory Text Memory in Younger and Older Adults.
    Icht M; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Mama Y
    Gerontology; 2022; 68(5):578-586. PubMed ID: 34530426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.
    Forrin ND; Groot B; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1090-111. PubMed ID: 26820499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trial-and-error learning improves source memory among young and older adults.
    Cyr AA; Anderson ND
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21859216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Memory as assessed by recognition and reading time in normal and memory-impaired people with Alzheimer's disease and other neurological disorders.
    Moscovitch M; Winocur G; McLachlan D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Dec; 115(4):331-47. PubMed ID: 2949044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Word predictability blurs the lines between production and comprehension: Evidence from the production effect in memory.
    Rommers J; Dell GS; Benjamin AS
    Cognition; 2020 May; 198():104206. PubMed ID: 32035323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event-related potentials differentiates the processes involved in the effects of sleep on recognition memory.
    Mograss MA; Guillem F; Godbout R
    Psychophysiology; 2008 May; 45(3):420-34. PubMed ID: 18221442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: a multinomial processing tree analysis.
    Küpper-Tetzel CE; Erdfelder E
    Memory; 2012; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 22171809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mental relaxation improves long-term incidental visual memory.
    Nava E; Landau D; Brody S; Linder L; Schächinger H
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 May; 81(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 15082018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects in recognition memory.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 16099368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
    Richland LE; Kornell N; Kao LS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 19751074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemispheric asymmetry in recognition memory: effects of retention level on the recognition of Portuguese words.
    Oliveira J; Perea MV; Ladera V; Gamito P
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 46(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 22044183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Encoding instructions and stimulus presentation in local environmental context-dependent memory studies.
    Markopoulos G; Rutherford A; Cairns C; Green J
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):610-24. PubMed ID: 20635301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accounting for children's orthographic learning while reading text: do children self-teach?
    Cunningham AE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 16714031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition.
    Van Strien JW; Hagenbeek RE; Stam CJ; Rombouts SA; Barkhof F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):952-9. PubMed ID: 15955505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.