These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22827815)

  • 1. Comparison of the flow characteristics of irrigants with standard and Max-i-Probe needles.
    Devi AA; Abbott PV
    Aust Endod J; 2012 Aug; 38(2):50-4. PubMed ID: 22827815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic recording of irrigating fluid distribution in root canals using thermal image analysis.
    Hsieh YD; Gau CH; Kung Wu SF; Shen EC; Hsu PW; Fu E
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jan; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17209827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional numeric simulation of root canal irrigant flow with different irrigation needles.
    Shen Y; Gao Y; Qian W; Ruse ND; Zhou X; Wu H; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 20416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical pressure and extent of irrigant flow beyond the needle tip during positive-pressure irrigation in an in vitro root canal model.
    Park E; Shen Y; Khakpour M; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 23522547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
    Ghivari S; Kubasad G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study.
    Boutsioukis C; Lambrianidis T; Kastrinakis E
    Int Endod J; 2009 Feb; 42(2):144-55. PubMed ID: 19134043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model.
    Boutsioukis C; Gogos C; Verhaagen B; Versluis M; Kastrinakis E; Van der Sluis LW
    Int Endod J; 2010 Oct; 43(10):874-81. PubMed ID: 20618879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of irrigant flow in the root canal using different needle types by an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model.
    Boutsioukis C; Verhaagen B; Versluis M; Kastrinakis E; Wesselink PR; van der Sluis LW
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):875-9. PubMed ID: 20416437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of pressure and flow rates during irrigation of a root canal ex vivo with three endodontic needles.
    Boutsioukis C; Lambrianidis T; Kastrinakis E; Bekiaroglou P
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):504-13. PubMed ID: 17326784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apical pressures developed by needles for canal irrigation.
    Bradford CE; Eleazer PD; Downs KE; Scheetz JP
    J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 12043877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model.
    Boutsioukis C; Gogos C; Verhaagen B; Versluis M; Kastrinakis E; Van der Sluis LW
    Int Endod J; 2010 Oct; 43(10):909-16. PubMed ID: 20618877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of irrigant penetration up to working length and into simulated lateral canals using various irrigating techniques.
    Spoorthy E; Velmurugan N; Ballal S; Nandini S
    Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):815-22. PubMed ID: 23550538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of root canal dimensions, injection rate, and needle design on the apical extrusion of an irrigant: an in vitro study.
    Chang JW; Cheung AW; Cheung GS
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 Aug; 6(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25047790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates.
    Khan S; Niu LN; Eid AA; Looney SW; Didato A; Roberts S; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 23522551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apical pressure created during irrigation with the GentleWave™ system compared to conventional syringe irrigation.
    Haapasalo M; Shen Y; Wang Z; Park E; Curtis A; Patel P; Vandrangi P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1525-34. PubMed ID: 26498770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrigation dynamics associated with positive pressure, apical negative pressure and passive ultrasonic irrigations: a computational fluid dynamics analysis.
    Chen JE; Nurbakhsh B; Layton G; Bussmann M; Kishen A
    Aust Endod J; 2014 Aug; 40(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 25244218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Weight of apically extruded debris following use of two canal instrumentation techniques and two designs of irrigation needles.
    Yeter KY; Evcil MS; Ayranci LB; Ersoy I
    Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):795-9. PubMed ID: 23441844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrigant dynamics of a back-to-back double side-vented needle in root canals with various tapers: a computational fluid dynamics study.
    Singh S; Zuber M; Verekar PP; Shetty T; Srikant N; Thomas MS
    Odontology; 2024 Oct; 112(4):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 38703256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using different root canal irrigation systems.
    Mitchell RP; Baumgartner JC; Sedgley CM
    J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1677-81. PubMed ID: 22099904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
    Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.