These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22828256)
21. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis. Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data. Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Allergy to 3-nitro-p-hydroxyethylaminophenol and 4-amino-3-nitrophenol in a hair dye. Søsted H; Menné T Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 15932582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Allergic contact dermatitis from ophthalmic products: can pre-treatment with sodium lauryl sulfate increase patch test sensitivity? Corazza M; Virgili A Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):239-41. PubMed ID: 15898995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contact dermatitis in the textile industry: a review of 72 patients. Soni BP; Sherertz EF Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Dec; 7(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 8955486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The patch test concentration for methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. Fewings J; Menné T Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Dec; 39(6):320-1. PubMed ID: 9874032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Does the new standard for eugenol designed to protect against contact sensitization protect those sensitized from elicitation of the reaction? Svedman C; Engfeldt M; Api AM; Politano VT; Belsito DV; Gruvberger B; Bruze M Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 22653067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contact allergy to pramoxine (pramocaine): the importance of testing to personal products. Hylwa SA; Warshaw E Dermatitis; 2014; 25(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 24819289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients. Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contact and photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. The Belgian experience. Matthieu L; Meuleman L; Van Hecke E; Blondeel A; Dezfoulian B; Constandt L; Goossens A Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Apr; 50(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15186381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Peristomal allergic contact dermatitis--case report and review of the literature. Martin JA; Hughes TM; Stone NM Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):273-5. PubMed ID: 15899001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]