211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22829158)
1. Indications and outcome of subtotal petrosectomy for active middle ear implants.
Verhaert N; Mojallal H; Schwab B
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1243-8. PubMed ID: 22829158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss.
Pok SM; Schlögel M; Böheim K
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 69():51-58. PubMed ID: 20610914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Two-Stage Subtotal Petrosectomy and Round Window Vibroplasty on Bone Conduction Thresholds.
Prenzler NK; Gruber L; Lenarz T; Maier H; Schwab B
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018; 80(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 29902786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subtotal petrosectomy and Codacs™: new possibilities in ears with chronic infection.
Schwab B; Kludt E; Maier H; Lenarz T; Teschner M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1387-91. PubMed ID: 26092235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
Sprinzl GM; Wolf-Magele A; Schnabl J; Koci V
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A middle ear implant with a titanium canal wall prosthesis for a case of an open mastoid cavity.
Deveze A; Rameh C; Sanjuan M; Lavieille JP; Magnan J
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Oct; 37(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 20167445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
Henseler MA; Polanski JF; Schlegel C; Linder T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing rehabilitation and microbial shift after middle ear surgery with Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with chronic otitis media.
Bruchhage KL; Lupatsii M; Möllenkolk F; Leffers D; Kurabi A; Jürgens T; Graspeuntner S; Hollfelder D; Leichtle A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3107-3118. PubMed ID: 36662266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiologic limitations of Vibrant Soundbridge device: Is the contralateral hearing aid fitting indispensable?
Jung J; Roh KJ; Moon IS; Kim SH; Hwang KR; Lee JM; Hou JH; Choi JY
Laryngoscope; 2016 Sep; 126(9):2116-23. PubMed ID: 26774568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
Colletti L; Mandalà M; Colletti V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window.
Sprinzl GM; Schoerg P; Muck S; Jesenko M; Speiser S; Ploder M; Edlinger SH; Magele A
Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1434-E1442. PubMed ID: 33210744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective European multicenter analysis of the functional outcomes after active middle ear implant surgery using the third generation vibroplasty couplers.
Rahne T; Skarzynski PH; Hagen R; Radeloff A; Lassaletta L; Barbara M; Plontke SK; Mlynski R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 32451668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant in mixed hearing loss. Indications, techniques, results.
Dumon T; Gratacap B; Firmin F; Vincent R; Pialoux R; Casse B; Firmin B
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 19813468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Middle ear implant in conductive and mixed congenital hearing loss in children.
Roman S; Denoyelle F; Farinetti A; Garabedian EN; Triglia JM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 76(12):1775-8. PubMed ID: 22985678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vibrant soundbridge middle ear implant in otosclerosis: technique - indication.
Dumon T
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 65():320-322. PubMed ID: 17245065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
