77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22829338)
21. Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity.
Kamber M; Flückiger-Isler S; Engelhardt G; Jaeckh R; Zeiger E
Mutagenesis; 2009 Jul; 24(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 19447896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Alternate hypothesis for the bimodal size distribution of mutant colonies of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells.
Mitchell AD
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1997; 29(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 9212795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials.
Donner M; Tran L; Muller J; Vrijhof H
Nanotoxicology; 2010 Dec; 4():345-6. PubMed ID: 20925444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Genetic toxicology. Principles and methods. Preface II.
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():vii-xi. PubMed ID: 22250336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid detection of mutagens accumulated in plant tissues using a novel Vibrio harveyi mutagenicity assay.
Podgórska B; Królicka A; Lojkowska E; Wegrzyn G
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2008 Jun; 70(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 17512590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Considerations for the Use of Mutation as a Regulatory Endpoint in Risk Assessment.
Klapacz J; Gollapudi BB
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2020 Jan; 61(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 31301246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Applying the erythrocyte Pig-a assay concept to rat epididymal sperm for germ cell mutagenicity evaluation.
Ji Z; LeBaron MJ
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Aug; 58(7):485-493. PubMed ID: 28714084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the SOS chromotest for detection of genotoxic drugs.
Marczewska J; Chłopkiewicz B; Ejchart A; Koziorowska J
Acta Microbiol Pol; 1993; 42(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 7509561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modifications of cellular mutagenicity test procedures.
Bridges BA
Lab Pract; 1972 Jun; 21(6):424. PubMed ID: 4499971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines.
Devillers J; Mombelli E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):753-69. PubMed ID: 21120760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of environmental mutagens using the FACIM assay.
Couteau J; Flaman JM; Minier C; Cachot J
Mar Environ Res; 2008 Jul; 66(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 18420266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: test methods.
Gatehouse D
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():21-34. PubMed ID: 22147566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Traditional test protocols.
Ashby J
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1994; 24(4):333. PubMed ID: 7851347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Preface: hazard identification.
Hayashi M
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Mar; 780-781():1. PubMed ID: 25892618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mutagenic response to benzene and tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)-phosphate in the lambda lacI transgenic mouse mutation assay: a standardized approach to in vivo mutation analysis.
Provost GS; Mirsalis JC; Rogers BJ; Short JM
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 28(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 8991062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Report of the IWGT working group on strategies and interpretation of regulatory in vivo tests I. Increases in micronucleated bone marrow cells in rodents that do not indicate genotoxic hazards.
Tweats DJ; Blakey D; Heflich RH; Jacobs A; Jacobsen SD; Morita T; Nohmi T; O'Donovan MR; Sasaki YF; Sofuni T; Tice R;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 17116417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The in vitro PIG-A gene mutation assay: mutagenicity testing via flow cytometry based on the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) status of TK6 cells.
Krüger CT; Hofmann M; Hartwig A
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2429-43. PubMed ID: 25417052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transgenic mutation models: research, testing, and reality checks.
Skopek TR
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1998; 32(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 9776170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. International workshop on mouse lymphoma assay testing practices and data interpretations: Portland, Oregon, May 7, 1994.
Garriott ML; Casciano DA; Schechtman LM; Probst GS
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1995; 25(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 7698109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
