These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22829786)

  • 1. U.S. EPA authority to use cumulative risk assessments in environmental decision-making.
    Alves S; Tilghman J; Rosenbaum A; Payne-Sturges DC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2012 Jun; 9(6):1997-2019. PubMed ID: 22829786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting Air Quality Standards for PM
    Smith AE
    Risk Anal; 2018 Nov; 38(11):2318-2339. PubMed ID: 30153708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US EPA's IRIS pilot program: establishing IRIS as a centralized, peer-reviewed data base with agency consensus. Integrated Risk Information System.
    Mills A; Foureman GL
    Toxicology; 1998 May; 127(1-3):85-95. PubMed ID: 9699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead.
    Chari R; Burke TA; White RH; Fox MA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2012 Apr; 9(4):1077-96. PubMed ID: 22690184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk assessment and risk management of noncriteria pollutants.
    Lee SD
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):245-55. PubMed ID: 1670281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human health and the environment can't wait for reform: current opportunities for the federal government and states to address chemical risks under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Trevisan L
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):385-430. PubMed ID: 25335197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: an overview.
    Nweke OC; Payne-Sturges D; Garcia L; Lee C; Zenick H; Grevatt P; Sanders WH; Case H; Dankwa-Mullan I
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Dec; 101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. PubMed ID: 22028456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixture toxicity, cumulative risk, and environmental justice in United States federal policy, 1980-2016 : Why, with much known, was little done?
    Sprinkle RH; Payne-Sturges DC
    Environ Health; 2021 Sep; 20(1):104. PubMed ID: 34535123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multi-route exposure assessment of chemically contaminated drinking water.
    Shehata AT
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Dec; 1(4):277-98. PubMed ID: 3843508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the Food Quality Protection Act children's health safety factor in the U.S. EPA pesticide risk assessments.
    Naidenko OV
    Environ Health; 2020 Feb; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 32041625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing policy relevant background (PRB) ozone concentrations in the United States.
    McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT; Brown N; Jacob DJ; Jaffe D; Kolb CE; Lefohn AS; Oltmans S; Parrish DD; Yarwood G; Zhang L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 45(22):9484-97. PubMed ID: 21985705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. If cumulative risk assessment is the answer, what is the question?
    Callahan MA; Sexton K
    Environ Health Perspect; 2007 May; 115(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 17520071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EPA as a public health agency.
    Goldstein BD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1988 Sep; 8(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 3238063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fundamentals of health risk assessment. Use, derivation, validity and limitations of safety indices.
    Putzrath RM; Wilson JD
    Risk Anal; 1999 Apr; 19(2):231-47. PubMed ID: 10765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The EPA's human exposure research program for assessing cumulative risk in communities.
    Zartarian VG; Schultz BD
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 20(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 19367326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
    Vogel SA; Roberts JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Let the IRIS Bloom:Regrowing the integrated risk information system (IRIS) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    Dourson ML
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Aug; 97():A4-A5. PubMed ID: 29729296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.