These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22830667)
1. Visual search for features and conjunctions following declines in the useful field of view. Cosman JD; Lees MN; Lee JD; Rizzo M; Vecera SP Exp Aging Res; 2012; 38(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 22830667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impaired attentional disengagement in older adults with useful field of view decline. Cosman JD; Lees MN; Lee JD; Rizzo M; Vecera SP J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Jul; 67(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 22048613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults. Wyche NJ; Edwards M; Goodhew SC Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 38922541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of aging on the useful field of view. Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Mamelak M Exp Aging Res; 2000; 26(2):103-20. PubMed ID: 10755218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters. Wood JM; Chaparro A; Lacherez P; Hickson L Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 22366710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Preliminary Study on Normalized Pattern-Reversal Peripheral Field SSVEPs as a Potential Objective Indicator of Useful Field of View Performance. Lin ST; Tey LK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):3248-56. PubMed ID: 27315540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer. Edwards JD; Vance DE; Wadley VG; Cissell GM; Roenker DL; Ball KK J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 16019630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of physical activity and appetite with visual function related to driving competence in older adults. Ando T; Sakai H; Uchiyama Y BMC Geriatr; 2017 Apr; 17(1):96. PubMed ID: 28446144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance. Myers RS; Ball KK; Kalina TD; Roth DL; Goode KT Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):279-90. PubMed ID: 11011899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Useful field of view test. Wood JM; Owsley C Gerontology; 2014; 60(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 24642933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Useful field of view after traumatic brain injury. Fisk GD; Novack T; Mennemeier M; Roenker D J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 17(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 11860326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view. Dye MW; Hauser PC; Bavelier D PLoS One; 2009 May; 4(5):e5640. PubMed ID: 19462009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: current and future implications. Clay OJ; Wadley VG; Edwards JD; Roth DL; Roenker DL; Ball KK Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):724-31. PubMed ID: 16127338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Puell MC; Barrio A Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Driving Characteristics of Older Drivers and Their Relationship to the Useful Field of View Test. Dukic Willstrand T; Broberg T; Selander H Gerontology; 2017; 63(2):180-188. PubMed ID: 27764828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive and visual predictors of UFOV performance in older adults. Matas NA; Nettelbeck T; Burns NR Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Sep; 70():74-83. PubMed ID: 24705277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults. Edwards JD; Ross LA; Wadley VG; Clay OJ; Crowe M; Roenker DL; Ball KK Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 May; 21(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 16704918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks. Reavis EA; Frank SM; Greenlee MW; Tse PU Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jun; 37(6):2319-30. PubMed ID: 26970441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study. Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring the Useful Field of View During Simulated Driving With Gaze-Contingent Displays. Gaspar JG; Ward N; Neider MB; Crowell J; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Ringer RV; Johnson AP; Kramer AF; Loschky LC Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):630-41. PubMed ID: 27091370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]